Listen To This Page:
Quick Navigation:
- Arizona Obstruction Crimes Explained
- What Counts as an Obstruction Offense Under Arizona Law
- How Obstruction Charges Differ From Other Criminal Offenses
- Penalty and Classification for Obstruction Charges
- Real World Examples of Obstructing Governmental Operations
- Criminal Defense Strategies for Obstruction Charges
- Frequently Asked Questions on Obstruction
- Important Things to Remember About Obstruction Crimes
- Contact a Criminal Defense Attorney From CHM Law
It is not uncommon for someone to be accused of interfering with a police officer’s duties during a stressful encounter. In many of these situations, the charge that may apply falls under Arizona law related to obstructing governmental operations. While the language can sound broad, the statute itself is more specific than most people expect.
Under Arizona Revised Statutes, a person commits obstructing governmental operations when they knowingly obstruct, impair, or hinder the performance of a governmental function by a public servant acting under color of his official authority. This often involves situations where someone is accused of getting in the way of law enforcement or interfering with enforcement of the penal law or the preservation of the peace.
This article breaks down how these cases are handled, what the prosecution must prove, what penalties may apply, and how a criminal defense attorney from CHM Law can help if you are facing an obstruction charge. If you are dealing with a criminal offense like this, understanding your rights and options early can make a meaningful difference in the outcome.
Facing Charges for Interfering With an Officer’s Duties in Arizona?
Speak with our Family Law Attorneys at CHM Law today.
Or, Continue Reading Below About:
How Arizona Handles Interfering With an Officer’s Duties | ARS 13-2402 Explained
Arizona Obstruction Criminal Defense and Obstruction Crimes Overview
Obstruction crimes in Arizona cover conduct where a person attempts to obstruct or interfere with a governmental function. The most common statute tied to interfering with an officer’s duties is § 13-2402, which focuses on obstructing governmental operations.
According to A.R.S, a person commits obstructing governmental operations if the person knowingly obstructs, impairs or hinders the performance of a governmental function by a public servant acting under color of his official authority. This can include actions that interfere with law enforcement officer duties or disrupt public order.
It is important to note that not every disagreement with a peace officer qualifies as obstruction. The statute is not meant to punish simple verbal frustration. Instead, it focuses on conduct that actually obstructs or creates impairment or hindrance of official duties.
The prosecution must show that the defendant acted knowingly and that the conduct impacted a lawful governmental function. Without that connection, it becomes harder for the prosecutor to prove that the person committed the offense.
What Counts as an Obstruction Offense Under Arizona Law
Under Arizona law, obstruction involves more than just being present at a scene. The state must show that the person knowingly took steps to obstruct or interfere with a governmental function by a public servant or peace officer acting under official authority.
The statute also refers to situations involving enforcement of the penal law or the preservation of the peace by a peace officer acting under color of his official authority. This means the conduct must tie directly to a duty being performed at the time.
Examples of conduct that may lead to an obstruction charge include:
- Physically blocking a law enforcement official during an investigation
- Threatening to use violence to stop an officer acting in an official role
- Creating impairment or hindrance that prevents a lawful task from being completed
- Interfering with law enforcement during active enforcement efforts
The law specifically states that the offense involves using or threatening to use violence or physical force in a way that obstructs official duties. That detail is critical when evaluating whether a charge is appropriate.
It is also important to understand that this statute does not apply to the making of an arrest. That means if the situation centers around resisting or preventing an arrest, a different statute may apply.
How Obstruction Charge Cases Differ From Other Offense Types in Arizona Law
Many people confuse obstruction with resisting arrest or other related offenses. However, these are separate under Arizona’s state laws.
For example, resisting arrest involves conduct that prevents an officer from completing an arrest. That charge can be classified as a felony depending on the facts. In contrast, obstructing governmental operations is typically treated as a misdemeanor offense.
There are also related laws such as 13-2409, which addresses impersonating a public servant. This involves pretending to be a law enforcement official or officer of the court, often through misrepresentation or intimidation. That type of conduct can be charged as a felony, including a class 5 felony or even a class 3 felony depending on the facts.
Another distinction involves obstructing criminal investigations. This may overlap with obstruction crimes, but each case depends on how the prosecution frames the alleged conduct and which statute best fits the situation.
Because multiple statutes can apply to similar situations, a strong criminal defense approach often involves evaluating whether the correct charge was filed and whether the facts support that classification.
Penalty and Classification for Obstruction Charges in Arizona
Obstructing governmental operations under § 13-2402 is generally classified as a class 1 misdemeanor. While it is not a felony, it is still one of the more serious misdemeanor crimes under Arizona law.
A misdemeanor offense can carry the following potential consequences:
- Up to 6 months in jail
- Up to $2,500 fine
- Up to 3 years of probation
- Additional court ordered conditions
These penalties can vary depending on the facts of the case and whether the person has prior misdemeanor or felony history.
Penalty Breakdown Chart
| Classification | Maximum Jail | Fine | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 1 misdemeanor | 6 months | $2,500 | Most common for obstruction |
| Class 2 misdemeanor | 4 months | $750 | Less severe related offenses |
| Felony (varies) | Prison possible | Higher fines | Applies to other statutes like impersonating a public servant |
Even though this is a misdemeanor offense, it can still create a lasting criminal record. That is why it is important to take any obstruction charge seriously and speak with a criminal defense attorney early.
Real World Examples of Obstructing Governmental Operations
Example 1: a person steps into an active investigation scene and refuses to move after being told by a law enforcement officer. If their conduct actually impairs or hinders the officer’s ability to perform a governmental function, the prosecution may argue that the person committed the offense.
Example 2: during a traffic stop, a passenger attempts to physically block a peace officer from speaking with the driver and threatens to use violence. This type of conduct could fall within the statute because it involves threatening to use violence to obstruct enforcement activity.
Example 3: a person refuses to assist an officer during an emergency situation where assistance is legally required. While refusing to assist alone is not always enough, if it rises to the level of interfering with law enforcement duties, it may be considered part of an obstruction analysis.
Each case depends heavily on the facts, including whether the conduct was lawful, whether the officer was acting within official authority, and whether the actions truly obstructed a governmental function.
Criminal Defense Strategies for Obstruction Charges
When defending against obstruction charges, the goal is often to challenge one or more elements of the offense. The prosecution must prove every part of the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Common defense strategies include:
- Arguing there was no actual obstruction or impairment
- Showing the conduct did not involve physical force or threats
- Challenging whether the officer was acting lawfully
- Demonstrating the defendant did not knowingly intend to obstruct
- Identifying inconsistencies in witness or officer statements
In some cases, a defense may focus on whether the officer’s actions were lawful in the first place. If the officer was not acting within the scope of official authority, that may impact whether the charge applies.
At CHM Law, our criminal defense team carefully reviews body camera footage, police reports, and witness statements to identify weaknesses in the prosecution’s case. We work to protect your rights and pursue the best possible outcome.
Frequently Asked Questions on Obstruction
Can I be charged for just arguing with a police officer?
Not usually. The law requires more than words. The prosecution must show that the conduct obstructed or interfered with a governmental function.
Is obstruction always a misdemeanor offense?
Most cases under this statute are misdemeanor crimes. However, related conduct under other statutes may be charged as a felony.
Does this apply during an arrest?
No. The statute specifically excludes the making of an arrest. Other laws apply to those situations.
What if I did not intend to interfere?
Intent matters. The state must prove that you acted knowingly and that your actions impacted official duties.
Can this charge be reduced or dismissed?
Yes. Many cases are resolved through negotiations or dismissed when the evidence does not support the charge.
Will this stay on my record?
A conviction can appear on your record. That is why it is important to address the case early with a defense attorney.
Important Things to Remember About Obstruction Crimes
- Obstruction crimes involve interfering with governmental functions
- The law focuses on conduct that actually obstructs or hinders duties
- Most cases are classified as misdemeanor offenses
- Some related offenses can be charged as a felony
- Each case depends on specific facts and evidence
- Early legal guidance can improve your outcome
Contact a Criminal Defense Attorney From CHM Law
If you are facing an obstruction charge or believe you may be under investigation, speaking with a criminal defense attorney as soon as possible can make a difference.
At CHM Law, we understand how quickly a situation with a law enforcement officer can escalate. Our team has experience handling misdemeanor and felony cases across Arizona, and we focus on protecting your rights at every stage.
We offer free one on one consultations so you can understand your options without pressure. Our attorneys have strong relationships with prosecutors and law enforcement, and we use that experience to pursue favorable outcomes for our clients.
Call CHM Law today at (602) 833-7371 to schedule your consultation.
Always Available 24/7 for Legal Help
Schedule an Appointment Today!
Call Us Now to Speak with an Attorney (602) 825-2500
Real Client Reviews
Below are just a few of what our clients have to say!
“Fantastic customer service”
This place is amazing! They listened to my concerns and needs and had fantastic customer service, they also gave me the best outcome for my case!
Aspen Bailey - Google Review
“Excellent service, caring, and a great communication”
Excellent service, caring, and a great communication. Don’t have a lot of experience with law firms, but this has been a very easy process
La Meany - Google Review
“I couldn’t be more satisfied with my experience”
I recently had the pleasure of working with Colburn Hintze Maletta, and I couldn’t be more satisfied with my experience. From the initial consultation to the final resolution of my case, the team demonstrated exceptional professionalism, expertise, and dedication.
Kyla Gress - Google Review
“Their exceptional customer service made a huge difference throughout the process”
I couldn’t be happier with Colburn Hintze Maletta PLLC. David and Tim were fantastic, —professional, knowledgeable, and always available to answer all my questions. Their exceptional customer service made a huge difference throughout the process. I highly recommend them for anyone needing legal support.
Jacklyn Mota - Google Review
“Best injury lawyers in Phoenix!”
I hired CHM Injury Attorneys after I got rear-ended and could not be happier with my decision. Darin, Jessica, Libby, Maeve, and the whole team have been awesome! They are knowledgeable and kept me informed throughout the case. Most importantly they helped me get the care I needed when I needed it. With CHM I didn’t feel like just another case. I felt like family. I strongly recommend CHM! They are the best injury lawyers in Phoenix!
Patrick Martin - Google Review
“They are excellent lawyers”
For me, they are excellent lawyers since in my family case they gave me exceptional service by winning custody of my daughter in my family case since I had almost everything lost, that is why I highly recommend them, thank you
Marcos Cabanas - Google Review
“His patience and professionalism are above reproach”
Don Colburn’s years of experience was a tremendous asset to my case. It truly showed that my process was lengthy and exhausting. His patience and professionalism are above reproach. Without Jen Bone, I truly feel my case would have gone in a very different direction. The time and energy she put into my case is something I am very thankful for. This law team understood my main focus was my children and they adhered to that focus for the entirety of my case. Thank you Jen and thank you Don!
Shayne Tuchfarber - Google Review
“He is truly the best”
I was new to AZ, and Scottsdale, when I was driving to the airport to pick up a friend coming to visit for the weekend. I was pulled over for a very minor traffic violation, which turned into a very surprising DUI arrest. I have only had one speeding ticket ever in my life, and I’ve never driven drunk before. I was confused how any of this had happened. Of course, as someone who doesn’t have any law issues, I wanted to have the best in my case. Luckily, I found Tim who truly is the best. I asked him many questions throughout our time working together and was very uneasy about the entire situation. He answered my questions and remained calm throughout the months it took to go to court. I was found not guilty of the DUI charges, and it was all thanks to Tim. I couldn’t recommend him high enough, he handled everything perfectly.
Megan - Avvo Review
“I cannot speak highly enough of her exceptional legal representation”
I recently had the privilege of working with Attorney Lauren Bostick, and I cannot speak highly enough of her exceptional legal representation. From the outset, Lauren demonstrated a remarkable balance of empathy and assertiveness, which truly set her apart. One of the most impressive aspects of Lauren’s approach was her unwavering empathy. She took the time to truly understand my situation and concerns, ensuring that I felt heard and supported throughout the legal process. Her compassionate demeanor provided much-needed reassurance during what was undoubtedly a challenging time. Moreover, Lauren’s assertiveness and tenacity were instrumental in securing a favorable outcome for my case. She navigated the complexities of the legal system with confidence and determination, advocating fiercely on my behalf. Thanks to her diligent efforts, I was able to achieve the custody arrangement I deserved and negotiate a fair settlement. In summary, Attorney Lauren Bostick is a consummate professional who goes above and beyond for her clients. Her combination of empathy and aggressiveness makes her a force to be reckoned with in the legal field. I am immensely grateful for her expertise and support, and I would highly recommend her services to anyone in need of legal representation.
Adam Kreman- Google Review
“He helped me win a case that was not in my favor”
David was an amazing attorney when I needed someone to defend me with my speeding ticket. He helped me win a case that was not in my favor. He knows what he’s doing and takes his time with each case. He is so experienced and could probably help with just about any issue. 10/10 Recommend
Afton Maxner - Google Review
“He provided outstanding support and expertise in handling my case”
I cannot recommend Tim enough, he provided outstanding support and expertise in handling my case, demonstrating both compassion and professionalism throughout. Their dedication and clear communication made a challenging time much easier to navigate, and I am deeply grateful for their exceptional service.
Ally Sanchez- Google Review
“She is an outstanding professional with extensive knowledge”
I wholeheartedly recommend Juanita for her exceptional expertise in family law. She is an outstanding professional with extensive knowledge and experience in this complex field. Juanita’s guidance and support have been invaluable, and her dedication to her clients is evident in everything she does. Her ability to navigate sensitive and complex family law matters with compassion and skill is impressive. If you’re seeking a trustworthy and knowledgeable family law professional, look no further than Juanita.
Regina Nuñez - Google Review
“I recommend her fully!”
Juanita Pena was very quick to respond and helped direct me to the resources I needed. I recommend her fully!
Ann MacDonald- Google Review
“The Service they provide is top notch”
I’m Extremely happy with the help I receive from CHM. The Service they provide is top notch. If you’re looking for an attorney I recommend CHM.
James Barajas - Google Review
“Throughout the whole process and he did a wonderful job”
Darin Colburn was my lawyer throughout the whole process and he did a wonderful job. He was always there when I needed him, explained things thoroughly, and wanted what was best for everyone. I’m very glad I chose him and in the end, we won the case. Thank you again!
Rita Canales- Google Review
“She always had my best interest in mind”
Lauren was outstanding throughout the whole process. She was always available as needed, upfront and honest, and very knowledgeable. Most lawyers don’t really have your best interest in mind. It’s all about their pocketbook. Lauren never gave that impression and comes from a place of sincerity. She always had my best interest in mind. If you happen to be unfortunate enough to need a lawyer, I sincerely recommend Lauren. I can’t imagine how anyone could be disappointed.
Daniel- Google Review
” She did an excellent job”
Juanita did an excellent job helping my family, we got the answers we needed and the info she gave us was easy to understand.
Jeremy Standfill - Google Review
“Their service is very highly professional”
I highly recommend you all here. Their service is very highly professional. They truly run this process as professionals.
Nahima Lemus - Google Review
“He was very kind and courteous”
Mr. David Maletta was very kind and courteous when he called me I explained my situation and he listened and then told me that I was fine. When I need a lawyer I will go through this firm and not be worried at all. Thank you again Mr. Maletta
Harold W Garlock Jr - Google Review
“The entire process was very efficient”
I worked with CHM to prepare a will and other legal documents for me. The entire process was very efficient, and they were very helpful in answering all of the questions I had. I highly recommend Juanita for your legal needs.