Listen To This Page:
Quick Navigation:
- What Is Prescription Fraud Under Arizona Law?
- Common Prescription Fraud Scenarios in Arizona
- How A.R.S. § 13-3406 Applies to Prescription-Only Drugs
- Controlled Substances and More Serious Prescription Fraud Charges
- Penalties for Prescription Fraud in Arizona
- What Does the Prosecutor Have to Prove?
- Prescription Fraud Defense Strategies
- Prescription Fraud and Professional License Consequences
- FAQs About Prescription Fraud Charges in Arizona
- Important Things to Remember About Prescription Fraud
- Contact a Criminal Defense Law Firm at CHM Law
A prescription fraud allegation in Arizona can start with something as simple as a pharmacist questioning a prescription, a medical office reporting an altered order, or law enforcement reviewing prescription records. What may seem like a minor dispute at a pharmacy can lead to a criminal investigation involving prescription records, electronic communications, medical records, surveillance footage, and statements made to police.
Arizona law treats prescription drug fraud differently depending on the type of drug and the conduct involved. Fraud used to obtain a prescription-only drug may fall under A.R.S. § 13-3406, while conduct involving a controlled substance, dangerous drug, or narcotic drug can expose a person to felony charges under other Arizona statutes. Arizona also has a separate law that specifically prohibits providing a false prescription for a controlled substance or obtaining one through forgery, fraud, deception, or subterfuge.
For someone facing prescription fraud charges in Phoenix, Scottsdale, Tempe, Mesa, Chandler, Gilbert, Queen Creek, Casa Grande, or another Arizona community, the details matter. The type of drug, the wording of the prescription, whether the prescription was legitimate, who allegedly changed the document, and what the accused person knew can all affect the criminal case. This article explains common prescription fraud scenarios, Arizona prescription drug laws, possible penalties, defense strategies, professional license concerns, and how a criminal defense attorney from CHM Law can help protect your rights.
Facing Charges for Prescription Fraud in Arizona?
Speak with our Criminal Defense Attorneys at CHM Law today.
Or, Continue Reading Below About:
Prescription Fraud in Arizona: Common Scenarios and Legal Defenses
What Is Prescription Fraud Under Arizona Law?
Prescription fraud generally refers to intentionally using fraud, deception, misrepresentation, forgery, or another unlawful method to obtain prescription medications. The exact criminal offense depends on what drug was involved and what a person allegedly did.
A.R.S. § 13-3406 states that a person may not knowingly obtain or procure the administration of a prescription-only drug through fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, or subterfuge. The same statute also makes it unlawful to knowingly possess or use a prescription-only drug without obtaining it through a valid prescription from an authorized prescriber.
Arizona law makes an important distinction between a prescription-only drug and a dangerous drug or narcotic drug. A.R.S. § 13-3401 defines a prescription-only drug in a way that excludes dangerous drugs and narcotic drugs. That distinction matters because fraud involving certain controlled prescription medications may be prosecuted under statutes carrying much more serious felony classifications.
Arizona also addresses false prescriptions for controlled substances directly in A.R.S. § 36-2531. That statute prohibits providing a false prescription for a controlled substance or knowingly or intentionally obtaining possession of a controlled substance through forgery, fraud, deception, subterfuge, falsification of a prescription, or failure to disclose a material fact. Violating that provision is a class 4 felony.
Because several laws may apply to the same conduct, a prescription fraud case should be evaluated based on the prescription itself, the type of drug, pharmacy records, statements attributed to the accused, and evidence of intent. A criminal defense attorney can determine which statute the prosecutor is relying on and whether the evidence supports each required element.
Common Prescription Fraud Scenarios in Arizona
Prescription fraud can occur in many forms. One common allegation involves altering a legitimate prescription. A patient may be accused of changing the quantity, dosage, number of authorized refills, or another part of a prescription before taking the prescription to a pharmacy.
Arizona pharmacy law requires prescription orders to contain specific information, including the date issued, patient information, prescriber information, drug name, strength, dosage form, quantity, directions, and authorized refills. Arizona law also establishes controls governing how prescription-only drugs may be dispensed.
Another common scenario involves forging prescriptions. A person might be accused of creating a prescription in a medical provider’s name, copying a prescription pad, using a stolen prescription pad, or electronically submitting a prescription that a medical provider never authorized. A.R.S. § 13-2002 may also become relevant because Arizona’s forgery statute applies when a person, with intent to defraud, falsely makes, completes, alters, possesses, or presents certain forged written instruments. Forgery is generally a class 4 felony.
A third scenario is sometimes called doctor shopping. The allegation may involve obtaining prescription drugs from multiple medical providers while failing to disclose important information about other prescriptions. Whether that conduct results in a prescription fraud charge depends on the evidence, the drug involved, and whether prosecutors can prove the required fraudulent intent or material nondisclosure. A.R.S. § 36-2531 expressly includes obtaining a controlled substance through fraud, deception, subterfuge, or nondisclosure of a material fact.
Consider an example involving a Mesa resident who receives a legitimate prescription for a noncontrolled prescription medication. A pharmacist notices that the quantity written on the prescription appears to have been changed from 10 tablets to 30. If investigators believe the patient altered the prescription, the case could involve allegations under Arizona prescription drug laws as well as possible forgery allegations. The state would still need evidence connecting that person to the alteration and proving the required mental state.
In another example, a Scottsdale resident presents what appears to be a prescription for a controlled pain medication. The pharmacy contacts the named medical office, which reports that the provider never issued the prescription. Because the medication is a controlled substance, the potential charges may extend beyond A.R.S. § 13-3406 and include A.R.S. § 36-2531 or another drug statute, depending on the medication and the evidence.
How A.R.S. § 13-3406 Applies to Prescription-Only Drugs
A.R.S. § 13-3406 is a key Arizona law governing prescription-only drugs. It prohibits knowingly possessing or using a prescription-only drug without a valid prescription. It also prohibits obtaining or procuring the administration of such a drug through fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, or subterfuge.
A violation involving obtaining a prescription-only drug through fraud under subsection A, paragraph 6 is classified as a class 1 misdemeanor. The same classification applies to unlawful possession or use under paragraph 1. The statute also imposes a mandatory $1,000 fine on a person convicted under the section, in addition to other penalties.
Other conduct under § 13-3406 can carry felony consequences. Unauthorized possession of a prescription-only drug for sale and certain unauthorized transportation, sale, transfer, or importation offenses are class 6 felonies. Manufacturing, selling, or distributing a misbranded drug can be a class 4 felony.
This is why the phrase prescription fraud does not identify a single Arizona criminal charge. Two people accused of prescription-related conduct may face very different penalties. One case may involve a class 1 misdemeanor under § 13-3406, while another involving a controlled substance, forged instrument, or drugs for sale may involve a felony.
Controlled Substances and More Serious Prescription Fraud Charges
When the medication involved is a controlled substance, the potential criminal exposure can increase sharply. A.R.S. § 36-2531 prohibits a person from providing a false prescription for a controlled substance or knowingly or intentionally obtaining possession of a controlled substance through forgery, fraud, deception, subterfuge, falsification of a prescription, or nondisclosure of a material fact. The offense is a class 4 felony.
Some prescription medications may also fall within Arizona’s dangerous drug laws. A.R.S. § 13-3407 makes it unlawful to knowingly obtain or procure the administration of a dangerous drug through fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, or subterfuge. That particular offense is a class 3 felony.
Arizona’s narcotic drug statute operates in a similar way. Under A.R.S. § 13-3408, obtaining or procuring the administration of a narcotic drug through fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, or subterfuge is a class 3 felony. A person convicted under that provision may be eligible for probation in some circumstances, including when statutory eligibility requirements relating to prior felony history are satisfied.
The prosecutor’s choice of charge may therefore depend heavily on the type of drug involved. Defense counsel should identify the substance, confirm its legal classification, review the prescription history, and examine whether the prosecution has correctly selected the statute that applies to the alleged conduct.
Penalties for Prescription Fraud in Arizona
Penalties for prescription fraud can range from misdemeanor consequences to several years in prison. A class 1 misdemeanor can result in up to six months in jail under A.R.S. § 13-707. A court may also impose a misdemeanor fine of up to $2,500 under A.R.S. § 13-802, while A.R.S. § 13-3406 itself requires an additional $1,000 fine for convictions under that statute.
Felony sentencing depends on the offense, prior criminal history, aggravating factors, mitigating factors, and whether another sentencing statute applies. For a person being sentenced under Arizona’s standard sentencing ranges for a non-dangerous felony with no prior felony conviction, A.R.S. § 13-702 provides a range of one year to 3.75 years for a class 4 felony, including mitigated through aggravated terms, and two years to 8.75 years for a class 3 felony. A class 6 felony carries a range of approximately four months to two years under the same framework.
Felony fines may also be substantial. Arizona law generally allows a felony fine of up to $150,000 for an individual unless another provision applies. Drug statutes may impose separate mandatory fines. For example, A.R.S. § 13-3407 requires a fine of at least $1,000 or three times the value of the dangerous drugs involved, whichever is greater, subject to the statutory maximum.
A conviction can also create consequences outside the courtroom. A permanent criminal record can affect employment, housing, education, professional licensing, and future background checks. For licensed health professionals, a drug-related criminal charge can create separate reporting and disciplinary issues.
The ranges shown above are general examples and do not predict the sentence in a particular prescription fraud case. Prior convictions and other sentencing laws can significantly change the potential punishment.
What Does the Prosecutor Have to Prove?
A prescription fraud charge is not established simply because a pharmacy rejected a prescription. The prosecutor must prove every element of the charged criminal offense beyond a reasonable doubt.
Many Arizona drug statutes contain a knowledge requirement. A.R.S. § 13-3406, for example, prohibits a person from knowingly engaging in listed conduct involving prescription-only drugs. A.R.S. § 13-3407 and 13-3408 also require knowledge for the drug offenses listed in those statutes.
That mental state can become a major issue when several people had access to a prescription, prescription pad, medical office account, or medication. The state may have to rely on circumstantial evidence to establish who made an alteration and whether the accused person knew a prescription was false.
For a forgery charge under A.R.S. § 13-2002, prosecutors must address intent to defraud. A person who innocently possesses or presents a document without knowing it has been altered is in a different legal position from someone who intentionally created or altered the document to deceive a pharmacy.
A defense lawyer should review not only the prescription itself but also pharmacy records, electronic prescription data, medical records, prescriber notes, text messages, phone records, surveillance footage, and police reports. Small details can affect whether the prosecution can prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Prescription Fraud Defense Strategies
The right prescription fraud defense depends on the facts. A defense attorney from CHM Law may examine several approaches rather than assume that every drug charge should be handled the same way.
Lack of Knowledge
Many prescription drug crimes require proof that the defendant acted knowingly. A person may have received a document from another person and believed it was legitimate. A patient may also reasonably believe that a medical office properly authorized a refill or corrected a prescription.
If the evidence does not establish that the accused knew the prescription was false, altered, or otherwise unlawful, the state may have difficulty proving the required mental state.
No Intent to Defraud
Cases involving forgery can turn on intent. Under A.R.S. § 13-2002, forgery requires intent to defraud. A clerical error, misunderstanding, incorrect transcription, or pharmacy processing issue is not automatically criminal forgery.
Defense counsel can compare the prescription with medical records and communications from the prescriber to determine whether an innocent explanation for the discrepancy exists.
The Prescription Was Legitimate
A valid prescription can be a direct defense to an allegation that a person unlawfully possessed prescription medication without authorization. A.R.S. § 13-3406 specifically permits possession or use when a prescription-only drug was obtained through a valid prescription from an authorized prescriber.
Medical office records, pharmacy histories, electronic prescribing records, and testimony from the prescriber may help establish that the accused was lawfully prescribed the medication.
Someone Else Altered the Prescription
A person presenting a prescription is not necessarily the person who altered it. Medical office staff, family members, caregivers, or others may have had access to documents or prescription information.
A criminal defense lawyer can examine handwriting evidence, computer records, electronic account access, timestamps, pharmacy surveillance video, and communications to determine whether the evidence actually identifies the person responsible.
Problems With Law Enforcement Statements
Police may attempt to question a person after a pharmacist reports suspected prescription fraud. Statements made during that encounter can become important evidence.
A defense attorney should examine how the questioning occurred, whether the person was in custody, whether Miranda warnings were required, whether any statements were voluntary, and whether investigators accurately documented what was said. A statement taken in violation of constitutional protections may be subject to a suppression challenge when the legal requirements for suppression are met.
Unlawful Search or Seizure
Prescription fraud investigations may involve phones, vehicles, purses, medical records, prescription papers, computers, or other evidence. Law enforcement officers generally must comply with constitutional search-and-seizure rules when collecting evidence.
If evidence was obtained through an unlawful search, a defense attorney may seek to exclude that evidence. Whether suppression is available depends on the facts, the location searched, any warrant involved, consent, and other recognized exceptions to the warrant requirement.
Insufficient Evidence Connecting the Accused to the Fraud
A pharmacist’s suspicion may begin an investigation, but suspicion alone does not prove guilt. The state must connect the defendant to the alleged misrepresentation or forged prescription.
The legal team at CHM Law can test whether the evidence actually establishes who created the prescription, who made an alteration, what the accused person knew, and whether an allegedly false statement was material to obtaining the drug.
Prescription Fraud and Professional License Consequences
Prescription fraud allegations can carry added risks for doctors, nurses, pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, and other licensed health professionals. Criminal exposure may be only one part of the problem.
Arizona law requires many health professionals who are charged with a felony, or with certain misdemeanors involving conduct that may affect patient safety, to notify their regulatory board in writing within ten working days after the charge is filed. Failure to comply with the reporting requirement can itself be treated as unprofessional conduct and may lead to additional disciplinary action.
Licensing rules also differ by profession. For example, Arizona law governing physicians identifies felony convictions or certain misdemeanors as unprofessional conduct. Pharmacy law likewise treats certain felony convictions, drug-related offenses, and violations involving prescription-only drugs or controlled substances as grounds relevant to professional discipline.
Someone whose livelihood depends on a professional license should tell the criminal defense attorney about the license as early as possible. Decisions made in a criminal case, including the wording of a plea agreement or the specific offense of conviction, can affect a separate licensing matter. CHM Law can evaluate the criminal case with those collateral consequences in mind and coordinate the defense strategy accordingly.
FAQs About Prescription Fraud Charges in Arizona
Is prescription fraud always a felony in Arizona?
No. Some conduct involving prescription-only drugs is a class 1 misdemeanor under A.R.S. § 13-3406. Fraud involving controlled substances, dangerous drugs, narcotic drugs, or forgery can lead to felony charges under other statutes.
Can I be charged if I had a valid prescription?
Having a valid prescription can be very important, but the answer depends on the allegation. A legitimate prescription may defeat an unlawful possession claim, yet prosecutors could still investigate whether someone allegedly altered the quantity, dosage, refills, or another part of the prescription.
What happens if a pharmacist thinks my prescription is fake?
A pharmacist may decline to fill the prescription and may contact the prescriber or law enforcement. If police become involved, your statements can become evidence. You can speak with a prescription fraud defense lawyer before giving a detailed statement about the allegation.
Can altering a legitimate prescription result in a forgery charge?
Potentially. A.R.S. § 13-2002 makes it forgery to falsely make, complete, or alter a written instrument with intent to defraud. It also covers knowingly possessing or presenting certain forged instruments. Forgery is generally a class 4 felony.
What if someone else changed the prescription?
Identity can be a central defense issue. Prosecutors must prove the defendant committed the charged offense. If another person had access to the prescription pad, electronic account, medication, or paper prescription, defense counsel can investigate whether the available evidence actually identifies who caused the alteration.
Can prescription drug fraud affect my professional license?
Yes. Health professionals can face regulatory reporting duties and licensing investigations in addition to the criminal case. Arizona law requires covered health professionals to report certain criminal charges within ten working days.
Should I hire an attorney before charges are filed?
Hiring a criminal defense attorney while a prescription fraud investigation is still pending can be highly valuable. Counsel may be able to communicate with investigators, preserve records, advise you before any interview, and identify evidence that supports a lawful explanation for the prescription.
Important Things to Remember About Prescription Fraud
- Prescription fraud in Arizona is not one single criminal offense.
- A.R.S. § 13-3406 applies to several offenses involving prescription-only drugs, including obtaining a drug through fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, or subterfuge.
- Fraud involving a controlled substance may be charged as a class 4 felony under A.R.S. § 36-2531.
- Fraud used to obtain certain dangerous drugs or narcotic drugs may be prosecuted as a class 3 felony under A.R.S. §§ 13-3407 or 13-3408.
- Altering or presenting a forged prescription may also create exposure under Arizona’s general forgery statute.
- The prosecution must prove the required mental state and every other element beyond a reasonable doubt.
- Medical records, pharmacy records, electronic prescription data, video, messages, and prescriber testimony can become important evidence.
- Doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and other licensed professionals may face separate reporting and professional license consequences.
- Speaking with a prescription fraud attorney early can help preserve evidence and prevent avoidable statements from damaging the defense.
Contact a Criminal Defense Law Firm at CHM Law
A prescription fraud case can involve several overlapping Arizona criminal statutes, and the difference between them can mean the difference between a misdemeanor and a serious felony. The criminal defense attorneys at Colburn Hintze Maletta can review the prescription, identify the drug classification, examine the state’s evidence, and determine whether the prosecutor can prove every required element.
CHM Law’s defense team handles criminal cases throughout Arizona, with a strong focus on Maricopa County and Pinal County. Our attorneys can investigate pharmacy records, medical records, electronic prescribing information, law enforcement reports, witness statements, and other evidence. When appropriate, the defense may challenge the alleged intent, the identity of the person responsible for an alteration, the legality of a search, or the reliability of statements used by prosecutors.
Our attorneys also have substantial experience working with Arizona prosecutors and law enforcement agencies. That experience can matter during plea negotiations, case conferences, evidentiary disputes, and trial preparation. When a fair resolution cannot be reached through negotiation, CHM Law has the trial skills to present the defense in court and require the state to meet its burden beyond a reasonable doubt.
If you have been charged with prescription fraud, are facing a prescription drug investigation, or believe a pharmacy or law enforcement agency may be investigating you, contact CHM Law for a free one-on-one lawyer consultation. Call 602-806-1436 to discuss your situation with an Arizona criminal defense attorney.
Always Available 24/7 for Legal Help
Schedule an Appointment Today!
Call Us Now to Speak with an Attorney (602) 825-2500
Real Client Reviews
Below are just a few of what our clients have to say!
“I actually interviewed 5 potential lawyers and David was the most optimistic of all of them.”
I have nothing but good things to say about my experience working with David Maletta. I was in a very high stress situation facing a pending dui charge. He doesn’t know this but I actually interviewed 5 potential lawyers and David was the most optimistic of all of them. He took over and handled everything, and now I don’t have to live with a dui. Thank you so much for everything! Highly recommend to anyone looking for legal help.
Lauren Koontz - Google Review
“She really knows her stuff”
Juanita is such a pleasure to interact with. She really knows her stuff and explains everything in great detail!
Isaac Ortega - Google Review
“We are very grateful for all of his assistance”
Because I was accused of felony DUI, we recruited David Maletta. The case was dropped to a misdemeanor DUI because of David Maletta’s excellent work. David Maletta went above and beyond to significantly improve a terrible situation because he genuinely cared about the case’s result. We are very grateful for all of his assistance. I would strongly suggest David Maletta to anyone facing a DUI offense.
Precilla - Avvo Review
“Nothing but good things to say about my experience.”
I have nothing but good things to say about my experience working with David Maletta. I was in a very high-stress situation facing a pending DUI charge. He doesn’t know this, but I actually interviewed 5 potential lawyers, and he was the most optimistic of all of them. He took over and handled everything, and now I don’t have to live with a DUI. Thank you so much for everything! Highly recommend them to anyone looking for legal help.
Lauren Koontz - Google Review
“Responsive, sympathetic, professional, patient, and kind.”
On one of the worst and most surreal nights of my life (do not EVER get a DUI people!) I was lucky enough to find my way to Tim Hintze. Being in Phoenix for the Thanksgiving holiday from out of town, and after spending the evening with family, I ended up spending the night in jail.
Tim turned one of the worst experiences in my life into “it could have been so much worse!” Working with him from a different state, he covered the bases & paperwork, showed up for me in court, gave me numerous connections to muck my way through the system, and held my hand the whole way.
I cannot imagine how much worse this experience could have been, and thanks to Tim, I didn’t need to. He was responsive, sympathetic, professional, patient, and kind throughout the long process, drawn out by many months due to Covid.
Keep Tim’s number handy and in your contacts in the event you are ever in the sorry position to need a DUI lawyer!
Holly Weber - Google Review
“I quietly thank him every day for the skills he brought to the table in dominating and winning my case”
There are times in life when it really matters to hire the BEST, and when I found myself in one of those critical situations, I relied on David Maletta to get the job done. From the moment I hired David, I knew I had made the right decision, and he performed at the highest level to protect and protect me from the legal problems I faced. I cannot say enough about the professional top-level service I received, and I quietly thank David Maletta every day for the skills he brought to the table in dominating and winning my case. When the outcome is important, do not pick a lawyer out of the phone book, -go straight to David Maletta and hire him, -HIRE THE BEST!
David - Avvo Review
“Forever grateful I chose this practice for my representation”
David Maletta is nothing short of a miracle worker. While I don’t believe anyone looks forward to hiring an attorney, David makes the legal process as stress free as it can be and does not give up until you obtain the outcome he is working towards. Forever grateful I chose this practice for my representation.
Michelle DeDora- Google Review
“Because of Darin I got my daughter back”
Before I hired Darin I went through a total of 3 different attorneys in two different states fighting a jurisdiction battle, when my daughter was taken to a different state. It was a very difficult decision to switch attorneys at one of the most difficult, time sensitive and important times in my case, but I’m very glad I did. Upon receiving my file from previous attorneys Darin came very familiar with my case quickly. Like other people have explained he took the time to lay everything out and explain how the process was going to proceed and what to expect and continued to do this as new issues arrived. He is also very quick at responding to emails and phone calls. My case was getting close to trial as told by my previous attorneys, I did not want to go to trial as I know this is very costly (most attorneys will convince you that you need to.) Darin knew my situation, fought for what was right and got the results I wanted while avoiding a costly trial. He is extremely knowledgeable in the Child Support Guidelines as well. Because of Darin I got my daughter back. I would highly recommend him and would hire again for any future issues. Thanks Darin!
Chris - AVVO Review
“He was my best choice”
During my long divorce I worked with few attorneys, and he was my best choice! He was always prepared, understanding the conflict and all new situations. His hard work and readiness helped me very much during this unpleasant process. He is young, but professional! He is a great attorney! Thank you, Darin.
Kristina Tsonev - Avvo Review
“Exceptional customer service”
Thank you Juanita for your professionalism, knowledge & exceptional customer service. I highly recommend and greatly appreciate it.
LeVonn Vonni Salas - Google Review
“The outcome was what I was hoping for!”
Darin Colburn was wonderful, professional and a wealth of information. He was so helpful along with Whitney his paralegal.. the outcome was what I was hoping for !! Thank you all for everything !! His entire office staff was great!! I am so thankful for all of you!!
Vicki Poutre - Google Review
“He made me feel like I was his number 1 priority”
Mr. Dave Maletta represented me in a legal matter that I had no idea where to start at. I contacted his office and they were very polite and made me feel comfortable from start to finish. Mr. Maletta was very thorough and professional! He returned my calls when I would leave a a message. He made me feel like I was his number 1 priority. Thank you again to the CHM office for everything you all did for me! I will definitely be recommending others to this place.
Living Life- Google Review
“I will, without hesitation, seek his counsel in the future if there is ever a need”
In a time of panic, Mr. Hintze proved to be invaluable I recently was denied a level one fingerprint clearance card through the Arizona Department of Public Safety as a result of a misdemeanor charge that occurred 16 years ago in my youth. This fingerprint card was the only thing standing between me and my ability to attend Arizona State University’s Edison College of Nursing. When I explained the details of my denial he immediately devised and executed a plan that ultimately resulted in me being awarded my fingerprint clearance card. Mr. Hintze’s confidence and steady demeaner brought a sense of relief to me, as I knew from the first conversation we had that his steadfast ability to navigate toward a productive resolution would be instrumental in my success. I appreciate Mr. Hintze beyond words and I will, without hesitation, seek his counsel in the future if there is ever a need.
Amanda - Avvo Review
“He brought me great success and left me with peace of mind”
This is an upstanding law firm with the highest level of character and integrity. My family law attorney, Henry, was very knowledgeable and wise. My situation was very complex with lots of moving parts and he expertly navigated everything from beginning to end. Henry is a great steward and never wasted a single hour of the time I paid him for. He also has a commanding presence in the courtroom. Henry is very discerning and will lead you through the most difficult situations with compassion and empathy. He brought me great success and left me with peace of mind when all that other attorneys had done for me is leave me with debt. I don’t usually leave reviews, but I’m telling you: please call Henry.
Christopher Burke - Google Review
“Extremely knowledgeable in his field of practice”
Tim is extremely knowledgeable in his field of practice. If you’re in one of those AZ cities that are still part of that “good ol’ boys” club, this is the man you need. He’s aggressive and confident in handling issues in arenas where you won’t get a fair shake. He’s your guy. One call, that’s all. You’re stuck with me now buddy!
Dino Flinstone - Google Review
“He was very helpful and made my experience amazing”
My experience with CHM was great. Highly Recommend them for your services. Darin was very helpful and made my experience amazing.
Cassandra R - Google Review
“She is truly a phenomenal attorney”
Lauren handled my family law case. She is truly a phenomenal attorney. She is extremely knowledgeable about all laws. She is attentive and never missed a single detail. While working on my case, she was thorough and always kept in contact with me to keep me informed on the status of my case. She ensured our safety and achieved the absolute best possible outcome for my case. I would HIGHLY recommend her to anyone seeking a family law attorney. Lauren has the utmost integrity and she is a true asset to her profession.
Taylor fava- Google Review
“She is a fierce advocate who will fight to protect you”
Lauren Bostick is an extremely skilled, competent, and compassionate attorney! She is a fierce advocate who will fight to protect you, your family, and your rights! I could not have picked a better attorney and highly recommend her for any family law matters. Her exceptional work deserves commendation.
jydiaz30 - Google Review
“Hands down the best attorney for family law!”
Darin is hands down the best attorney for family law! He made me feel heard and validated in my concerns for my daughter during this custody battle and was very up-front about what to expect and what was a likely outcome right off the bat. Communication was constant and timely, even when he couldn’t handle a concern or something going on with the case due to scheduling he pulled the entire firm in to help and get everything done! I’ve never experienced such a friendly, understanding, and caring manner from an attorney before so I will ALWAYS recommend this amazing law firm to anyone who needs it.
Kyla Dawnne- Google Review
“He is the best he got all the charges dropped”
I was assaulted by two drunk bigots who threw anti semitic slurs at me outside of my favorite restaurant. Im 5’8 158 pounds the main guy “William” who assaulted me is 6’2 205 pounds and tattooed up but falsely claimed I hit him so hard his face was swollen up to the point where he couldn’t work for a month and was seeking $7348 in damages. A false police report was filed against me and William’s best friend Taylor who also assaulted me corroborated the bs story to the best of his ability. For a while I lost my faith in humanity because I was being charged with assault for self defense by the state of Arizona. Rather than pay off William with a misdemeanor compromise I did something he didn’t expect and hired David. In court David proved to the judge that William and Taylor were lying through cross examination he found four cases where they contradicted each other or changed their stories. David also brought up police body camera footage of a civilian explaining what happened which was a completely different story than what William and Taylor had told police, the look on the prosecutors face was priceless. If found guilty I would have a criminal record for the rest of my life and probably lose my real estate license so it meant the world to me that David got all the charges dropped.