Listen To This Page:
Quick Navigation:
- What Counts as a Narcotic Drug Under ARS § 13-3408
- How Prosecutors Build Narcotic Drug Cases in Arizona
- Pre-Charge Investigations for Narcotic Drug Offenses
- Simple Possession vs. Possession for Sale
- Penalties for Possession of Narcotic Drugs in Arizona
- Real-World Examples of Narcotic Drug Cases in Arizona
- Common Defenses to Narcotic Drug Charges
- Defenses Against Fentanyl-Related Charges
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Important Things to Remember
- Contact a Criminal Defense Attorney at CHM Law
People across Arizona are encountering narcotic drug charges more often than ever, especially in cases involving fentanyl.
When an officer claims you possessed a narcotic drug, the situation can feel confusing because the law separates simple possession from transportation, possession for sale, and other conduct that leads to significantly harsher outcomes.
Each version of the offense is handled under ARS § 13-3408, which governs the manufacture, possession, sale, and transportation of a narcotic drug in Arizona.
Although fentanyl is a synthetic opioid and only a very small amount can lead to a felony, not every case is as straightforward as the police report may suggest. Factors such as the amount found, where it was located, whether you knew about it, and whether paraphernalia was involved all shape the seriousness of the charge.
Understanding how these cases are built, what the State must prove, and how a defense can be raised is important before deciding how to proceed.
This article breaks down how Arizona law treats narcotic drug offenses, explains what prosecutors must prove, outlines penalties for each level of narcotic drug possession, transportation, or sale, and shows how an experienced criminal defense attorney at CHM Law can protect your future. If you or a loved one were charged with possession of fentanyl or another narcotic drug, this guide will help you make sense of the process and what options you may have.
Facing Drug Possession Charges in Arizona?
Speak with our Criminal Defense Attorneys at CHM Law today to protect your rights, your freedom, and your future.
Or, Continue Reading Below About:
Arizona Law on Fentanyl and Narcotic Drug Possession: ARS § 13-3408
What Counts as a Narcotic Drug Under ARS § 13-3408
Under ARS 13-3408, fentanyl, heroin, and other opioid substances fall under the category of a narcotic drug.
Because fentanyl is an extremely potent synthetic opioid, law enforcement treats even small quantities as serious. The statute applies to anyone who possesses, uses, manufactures, or transports narcotic drugs in Arizona.
Prosecutors do not need to prove actual ingestion of the substance. Instead, they only need to prove that a person knowingly possessed or controlled it.
The law references narcotic drugs in Arizona as controlled substances that pose a significant risk of harm. The growing concern about fentanyl in Arizona has led officers to conduct wider searches and investigations when they believe a narcotic may be involved.
That said, prosecutors still must meet each requirement of the statute. Knowledge, control, and intent all matter, and each element can be challenged.
Clients often ask whether residue counts in drug crime cases. In many cases, fentanyl residue found inside foil or on a counterfeit pill can still support a narcotic drug possession charge. The quantity becomes more important when prosecutors attempt to prove sale or transportation rather than simple possession.
Because the statute covers everything from personal use to drug trafficking, the exact facts of the encounter shape how serious the allegation becomes. An early review by an attorney helps determine whether the State can actually prove what it claims.
How Prosecutors Build Narcotic Drug Cases in Arizona
Prosecutors rely heavily on police reports, field tests, and lab results to build cases involving a narcotic drug.
They often begin by documenting where the fentanyl was found, whether there were packaging materials present, and whether there were statements made by the accused.
In cases involving a vehicle, they may also focus on constructive possession, meaning the drug was near someone even if not directly on them.
The State may also use surrounding items as evidence of intent in a drug crime case.
For example, powder, baggies, scales, or large amounts of cash can be used to argue possession for sale or transportation of narcotic drugs. However, these items are often misinterpreted or unrelated to narcotic drugs entirely.
A skilled defense lawyer challenges assumptions like these, especially when the evidence does not support drug trafficking or manufacturing a narcotic drug.
Another focus for prosecutors is proving that the accused knew the substance was present.
This becomes difficult when multiple people share a home or vehicle in relation to drug crime. Knowledge cannot be assumed. If one person denies knowing about fentanyl found under a seat or inside a bag, prosecutors must show more than proximity to prove a narcotic drug offense.
Evidence gathered through questionable search-and-seizure practices is also a factor. If officers searched without probable cause or unlawfully extended a traffic stop, the evidence may be suppressed. This is one of the strongest avenues in many narcotic drug cases.
Pre-Charge Investigations for Narcotic Drug Offenses
Many clients contact CHM Law before formal charges are filed.
A pre-charge investigation can shape the outcome of narcotic drug allegations under ARS § 13-3408 because prosecutors often rely entirely on police reports when deciding whether to file charges in Arizona.
During a pre-charge investigation, our criminal defense team contacts the assigned detective, gathers preliminary information, and presents mitigating evidence to the prosecutor before a charging decision is made.
This approach is especially helpful in fentanyl cases where the facts are unclear or where the accused may qualify for treatment interventions.
If you know you are under investigation for possession of fentanyl, possession of narcotic drugs, or transportation of narcotic drugs, quick action is important.
Officers often request interviews, attempt to collect statements, or pressure someone into admitting knowledge of the substance.
Speaking with CHM Law before any communication with law enforcement protects your rights and significantly improves the chances of charges being reduced or dismissed before filing.
Simple Possession vs. Possession for Sale
The difference between simple possession and possession for sale is significant.
A person charged with simple possession typically has a smaller quantity of a narcotic drug and no indicators suggesting intent to sell.
Factors such as location, containers, packaging materials, or scales may influence the State’s interpretation of the situation.
Simple possession of a narcotic drug, including fentanyl, is generally treated as a class 4 felony, though many first-time offenders may be eligible for probation.
Participation in a diversion program is sometimes an option, depending on the county and the facts of the case.
Possession for sale, transport for sale, or import into this state, or Manufacture or transportation of narcotic drugs can lead to severe penalties under Arizona law that are charged as class 2 felonies, which carry much harsher consequences.
Under ARS 13-3408, the intent to sell can be inferred based on quantity or by the presence of drug paraphernalia associated with distribution. However, these inferences are not always valid. Many cases involve simple possession but are charged as higher felony offenses due to misunderstandings of the facts, leading to severe penalties.
Because penalties increase significantly as the charge level rises, a defense lawyer examines every factor, including the amount of fentanyl, the surrounding evidence, and whether prosecutors can prove intent rather than rely on an assumption.
Penalties for Possession of Narcotic Drugs in Arizona
Penalties vary widely depending on whether the charge involves simple possession, possession with intent to sell, or transportation.
Under ARS § 13-3408, the State may pursue a felony offense with a prison sentence, probation terms, or treatment requirements.
Below are general penalty ranges by conduct type, with particular emphasis on cases involving fentanyl. The exact sentence imposed by the court depends on the quantity, criminal history, and whether the case involved distribution.
| Offense Under ARS § 13-3408 | Felony Classification | Potential Penalties | Notes / ARS References |
| Simple possession of a narcotic drug (including fentanyl) | Class 4 felony | Probation available for many first-time offenders, possible prison if aggravated | ARS § 13-3408(A)(1) |
| Possession of narcotic drugs for sale | Class 2 felony | 3 to 12.5 years in prison for a first conviction | ARS § 13-3408(A)(2) |
| Transport for sale or import into this state | Class 2 felony | Lengthy prison sentence, higher ranges when quantity exceeds threshold | ARS § 13-3408(A)(7) |
| Manufacturing a narcotic drug | Class 2 felony | Severe penalties including mandatory prison | ARS § 13-3408(A)(3) |
| Sale of a narcotic | Class 2 felony | Prison sentence increases based on quantity and prior record | ARS § 13-3408(A)(4) |
These penalties are only general outlines. Felony classifications are influenced by aggravating factors, the presence of drug paraphernalia, and prior convictions. Because fentanyl is treated as a hazardous drug due to its potency, prosecutors often push for higher sentencing ranges.
Real-World Examples of Narcotic Drug Cases in Arizona
Example 1
A driver in Phoenix was stopped for a minor traffic violation. Officers claimed to smell marijuana and searched the car. They found two counterfeit pills suspected to contain fentanyl under a passenger seat. The driver denied knowledge, and no paraphernalia or cash was found. After challenging the search and seizure and showing the pills were not in the driver’s control, the case was dismissed before indictment.
Example 2
A Tempe resident was arrested after officers found multiple foil squares and a scale in his backpack. Prosecutors charged possession for sale of a narcotic drug under the Arizona Revised Statutes. After reviewing the lab results and the client’s addiction treatment records, CHM Law negotiated a reduction to a charge of simple possession, making the client eligible for probation instead of a lengthy prison sentence.
These examples highlight how the facts of each case shape the outcome and how charges may be reduced when the evidence does not support intent to sell.
Common Defenses to Narcotic Drug Charges
A strong defense focuses on exposing weaknesses in the State’s case. CHM Law uses several strategies depending on the facts:
1. Unlawful Search and Seizure
If the officer lacked probable cause, any narcotic drug or paraphernalia found during an illegal search may be suppressed.
2. Lack of Knowledge
Prosecutors must prove that the accused knew about the substance. Shared vehicles and homes often lead to assumptions that are weak.
3. No Intent to Sell
Indicators such as baggies or a scale do not automatically prove drug trafficking. Many cases involve personal use rather than distribution.
4. Invalid Field Testing
Preliminary drug tests often produce false positives. Lab confirmation is required for a narcotic drug conviction.
5. Coerced Statements
If officers pressured the accused or violated their rights, these statements may be excluded.
Each defense is analyzed based on the specific facts, evidence, and whether officers followed proper procedure.
Defenses Against Fentanyl-Related Charges
Because the potency of fentanyl is extremely high, law enforcement sometimes assumes trafficking when the evidence only supports personal use. Common defenses include:
Challenging weight and purity
Fentanyl testing is highly sensitive. Lab errors can significantly affect the classification of an offense in Arizona.
Arguing personal use
Even a few pills or foil squares can be misinterpreted. Without clear indicators of sale, a class 2 felony may not be justified.
Questioning constructive possession
Fentanyl found in a car or home does not automatically mean the accused had control of it.
Entrapment
In rare cases, Law enforcement induced the accused in a drug crime investigation to commit the act. This can be a valid defense when officers overstep their role.
Errors in warrant execution
Improper warrants, expired warrants, or searches beyond the warrant’s scope can result in the evidence being thrown out.
Cases involving fentanyl require careful analysis because the consequences are severe and often based on assumptions rather than solid evidence.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is fentanyl charged differently from other narcotics?
Fentanyl is treated seriously because it is a powerful synthetic opioid. However, it is still charged under ARS 13-3408, similar to heroin and other opioids.
Can I get probation for simple possession?
Many first-time offenders are eligible for probation, especially when the case involves personal use and no intent to sell.
Does residue count as possession?
Yes, even residue can support drug possession Charges related to drug crime if prosecutors can prove knowledge and control.
What if someone else owned the drugs?
Knowledge cannot be assumed. This is a common defense when multiple people share a home or vehicle.
Can a case be dismissed during a pre-charge investigation?
Yes, CHM Law frequently resolves narcotic cases before formal criminal charges are filed.
Do I need to submit to drug testing?
If your probation terms or diversion program require it, then yes. Courts may require you to submit to drug testing administered by a probation officer or treatment provider.
Important Things to Remember
- Not every narcotic drug case supports a class 2 felony charge.
- Knowledge and intent must be proven, not assumed.
- Search and seizure issues can result in the suppression of evidence.
- Fentanyl cases are often overcharged based on quantity alone.
- Pre-charge representation can influence whether charges are filed.
- Diversion may be available for certain first-time offenders.
- CHM Law reviews every detail to explore all possible defenses.
Contact a Criminal Defense Attorney at CHM Law
If you or a loved one is facing potential penalties for fentanyl-related charges in Arizona or any narcotic drug offense under ARS § 13-3408, the attorneys at Colburn Hintze Maletta are ready to help. Our team understands how these cases are prosecuted, what weaknesses to look for, and how to challenge the elements of possession, intent, and knowledge.
We routinely handle drug cases and can provide guidance during pre-charge investigations, hearings, and negotiations. Whether you were charged with fentanyl offenses, accused of possession of narcotics, or facing allegations involving manufacture or transportation, CHM Law will advocate for you at every stage of the process.
To speak directly with a criminal defense attorney, call 602-825-2500. CHM Law will review your case, explain your options, and work to protect your freedom and your future.
Always Available 24/7 for Legal Help
Schedule an Appointment Today!
Call Us Now to Speak with an Attorney (602) 825-2500
Real Client Reviews
Below are just a few of what our clients have to say!
“She exceeded my expectations”
Lauren Bostick is exceptional! She took the stress and worry out of the divorce process and completely put me at ease. She exceeded my expectations and fought to protect my kids and me. I would highly recommend her and cannot thank her enough for the impact she has had on our lives.
Carmen Waggoner - Google Review
“I quietly thank him every day for the skills he brought to the table in dominating and winning my case”
There are times in life when it really matters to hire the BEST, and when I found myself in one of those critical situations, I relied on David Maletta to get the job done. From the moment I hired David, I knew I had made the right decision, and he performed at the highest level to protect and protect me from the legal problems I faced. I cannot say enough about the professional top-level service I received, and I quietly thank David Maletta every day for the skills he brought to the table in dominating and winning my case. When the outcome is important, do not pick a lawyer out of the phone book, -go straight to David Maletta and hire him, -HIRE THE BEST!
David - Avvo Review
“She handled our case masterfully”
We had a great experience with Juanita. She handled our case masterfully, the process was smooth. Highly recommend.
Charne Gibson - Google Review
“A job well done, Thank you!!”
I hired Darin after my ex abandoned our marriage. Darin put me in touch with a private investigator to serve papers to my ex that I’d filed seven days after she disappeared. No luck there, the P.I. could not find my ex, so Darin prepared me for a default case. Lo and behold, my ex surfaced and had a process server deliver legal papers to me. I emailed copies of the papers to Darin. We had a meeting where we detailed our response. A dispute resolution conference was set, and Darin gave great advice including a settlement proposal. We met with the opposing parties, my ex had hired a lawyer. The conference was a bust since my ex decided to claim a larger settlement, including personal property?! Darin assured me my ex had no valid claim to my personal property since I had gained them before the marriage. Before the next resolution conference, my ex upped her claim to approximately $1300/month for four years plus money from my personal property. She’d made unfounded allegations against me. I think she thought the allegations would be taken seriously even though there was no evidence to support her allegations. This is why she was asking for so much money and my personal property. She had been here in the U.S.A. for only two years and left two days after the approval of her ten year spousal green card.
An alternate resolution conference was set for April. The opposing council asked for an extension of my settlement proposal for $500 a month for one year and money to pay off the vehicle my ex took when she left. A judge pro tem presided over the alternate resolution conference. He asked questions of Darin, I and the opposing party. The process went well. All the advice given to me by Darin proved invaluable. The judge ended the conference when my ex finally accepted the settlement proposal. At the end I shook Darin’s hand for a job well done.
The process of my divorce took ten months and attorney’s fees but in my opinion was worth it to end a failed marriage.
Keith - Avvo Review
“I recommend her fully!”
I highly recommend Juanita. She will speak to you with compassion, respect, and transparency.
Jordan Woodruff - Google Review
“The best legal counsel”
Huge Shoutout to Dave and Juanita for being the best legal counsel! From the moment they answered the phone they were very understanding and patient
Andrew Vazquez - Google Review
“They had very clear understanding with great patience”
I love the customer service. They really take their time to provide knowledge and a very clear understanding with great patience.
Monica Scott - Google Review
“I felt secure and protected the whole time”
I just went through 4 of the worst years of my life. Over half of which was spent in a prolonged divorce. It didn’t have to take over 2 years, but that was my fault. I’m not the easiest client to have, but somehow, Darin Colburn handled me and my toxic marriage with absolute perfection. Darin was very professional, tolerant, understanding, and knowledgeable while delivering the best possible results imagined. Mr. Colburn was there for me every step of the way. I felt secure and protected the whole time. I don’t think my case could have been any smoother had I hired anyone else. In the end and along the way, Darin earned every penny plus my respect and appreciation. If I ever need legal representation again, I will look no further than Darin Colburn. Thank you, Darin!
Az Aces- Google Review
“She was able to take my worries and fears off my shoulders”
There is not a single mother out there who is ever prepared for the phone call from the local police department. That phone call can change your life. I got into contact with Jessica Hernandez of Colburn Hintze and Maletta and she was able to take my worries and fears off my shoulders. She worked extremely hard to get the results that my son needed and got him released with probation. She was able to set my mind at ease and she continued to remind me that these actions of my son did not define the person he is. What a gift to have someone defend my child and at the same time not make me feel like I was judged as a bad parent or a failure. Thank you Jessica for taking him on and for never giving up on him. Thank you for being an amazing attorney and for always taking my questions.
Brandy Waldeck- Google Review
“He was very thorough and professional all the way through”
Dave Maletta Attorney represented me in a legal matter and he did an excellent job. He was very thorough and professional all the way through. I would highly recommend his services and his firm. He and his firm did an excellent job apprising me every step of the way about what to do what to expect and the legal process. I very much appreciate his help and I would recommend his services and his firm very strongly as I feel I received a high value for the legal services I requested.
Roger Donohue - Google Review
“Responsive, sympathetic, professional, patient, and kind.”
On one of the worst and most surreal nights of my life (do not EVER get a DUI people!) I was lucky enough to find my way to Tim Hintze. Being in Phoenix for the Thanksgiving holiday from out of town, and after spending the evening with family, I ended up spending the night in jail.
Tim turned one of the worst experiences in my life into “it could have been so much worse!” Working with him from a different state, he covered the bases & paperwork, showed up for me in court, gave me numerous connections to muck my way through the system, and held my hand the whole way.
I cannot imagine how much worse this experience could have been, and thanks to Tim, I didn’t need to. He was responsive, sympathetic, professional, patient, and kind throughout the long process, drawn out by many months due to Covid.
Keep Tim’s number handy and in your contacts in the event you are ever in the sorry position to need a DUI lawyer!
Holly Weber - Google Review
“He gives sound advice and also what is in the best interest of the client”
Aside from being a genuinely nice person, David Maletta is an excellent lawyer. He gives sound advice and also what is in the best interest of the client. I highly recommend his services.
Robert Carolina - Google Review
“She was very helpful”
Juanita Pena was very helpful in answering questions regarding family law. She clarified any concerns we had in a cordial manner.
Juanita Soto - Google Review
“He was very helpful and made my experience amazing”
My experience with CHM was great. Highly Recommend them for your services. Darin was very helpful and made my experience amazing.
Cassandra R - Google Review
“Thankful for the excellent service he provide”
Dave stayed with me while he pushed back and forth with Covid-19 and the delays with the court. Once cited, the state basically decides that your guilty through the automatic suspension of your drivers license. Dave immediately took care of that problem and I never lost the privilege of driving. Dave took notes like crazy and was upfront about our uphill battle. I was also well aware that the plea deal that was given to us, was unacceptable and through Dave’s knowledge and experience I had put my trust in him to guide me to make the right decision on how to proceed. With Daves guidance I had decided that we needed to fight for something better than what the prosecutor was offering and Dave was 100 percent behind me on that decision. We knew the risks, be we also knew we had very little to lose based on the prosecutions stance. We decided to go to trial. I knew and felt that it was a long shot based on some of the information in the police report, but I also knew that it was not true. We met previous to the trial so I could better understand what the process is once we get into the court room. Dave answered may questions and spent a lot of time with me trying to be sure I understood things and what time I needed to be there and what would happen once we got there. We worked together on jury selection on the day of trial and we began the case. Watching the prosecution and then watching Dave was night and day!! Dave brought the case to life, Dave grabbed the attention of the jury, Dave had me staring, listening, watching and not missing a beat when he went to fight for me, his client. He went through his notes through the 2 days of trial and his big book. It was clear that he was completely familiar with the facts of the case, the facts on the incident and the responsibility of the prosecution in areas that they weren’t competent. Dave took steps throughout the 2 days that sometimes had me concerned, but his experience calmed me down, once he educated me on this. It was clear to the jury that we working as team. It was clear to the jury that the prosecution didn’t have their facts straight and were not addressing the facts that they could not address. I was nervous to say the least. There was a lot at stake for my personal life and my work life. I was found NOT GUILTY. Dave won the trial for me. I was not only found not guilty, I was found not guilty on 2 counts. I owe this to Dave to truly bring the facts forward, make the arguments, show his passion and his knowledge of the facts and convince the jury that they had reasonable doubt and could not find me guilty. Dave has some fire in him that will come out in trial and it’s rare to have someone with enough personality to relate to the jury and to his client. I am so thankful that I had Dave Maletta as my attorney. It has taken me over a week to finally let it all soak in after 2 1/2 years of stress.
Gregory - Avvo Review
“He is a very fine, experienced, and capable defense attorney”
David Maletta is a very fine, experienced, and capable defense attorney. He successfully defended 2 members of our family in the last 2 years, with very favorable outcomes. He is an excellent communicator who pays attention to detail and explains things well. Despite being a tough adversary in court, he is a kind and caring human being. We highly recommend him.
Stan- Avvo Review
“They provide outstanding legal services”
Colburn Hintze Maletta PLLC provided outstanding legal services. Their expertise and dedication were evident from our first consultation through to the successful resolution of my case. They were attentive to my needs, responsive to inquiries, and navigated complex legal issues with confidence. I highly recommend them for anyone seeking reliable and knowledgeable legal representation.
Izac - Google Review
“He handled my contested divorce with such professionalism and skills”
I was lucky to work with Attorney Tim Hintze on my family law matter, and I can’t thank him enough for the help he provided. He handled my contested divorce with such professionalism and skill, which really put my mind at ease. His guidance throughout the legal process was incredibly valuable, and he made sure to take care of every little detail in the court orders. Having Attorney Hintze by my side gave me so much peace of mind. He really listened to my concerns and offered thoughtful solutions. I would wholeheartedly recommend Attorney Hintze to anyone dealing with legal challenges, and I will always appreciate his support.
Ezequiel Magana- Google Review
“This team and office truly are miracle workers and genuinely care about you”
Called and spoke with a lady named Juanita. I told her my situation about a legal matter. She connected me with David who represented me. I had an ugly situation that could have cost me losing my job. David made sure all my questions were answered. What was really amazing was that Juanita would call to check up and make sure I knew what I needed and if I had any questions. This team and office truly are miracle workers and genuinely care about you. Thank you all again at CHM!
Martha Rentaria- Google Review
“I was impressed with his knowledge and quick response to my needs”
David Maletta is very detailed in his explanation of legal procedures. I was impressed with his knowledge and quick response to my needs. He instantly made me feel at ease. He is very professional, caring, and trustworthy. I highly recommend his services.