Quick Navigation:
- Religion and Child Custody Under Arizona Law
- How Legal Custody Affects Religious Decisions
- Best Interests of the Child and Religious Considerations
- Mixed Faith Parenting and Joint Legal Custody
- When One Parent Has Sole Legal Custody
- First Amendment Rights and Arizona Family Law
- What Arizona Courts Usually Avoid Ordering
- Holidays, Religious Services, and Parenting Time
- What Happens When Parents Disagree About the Religious Upbringing
- Important Things to Remember About Religion and Custody
- How a Family Law Attorney From CHM Law Can HelpReligion and Child Custody Under Arizona Law
Parents going through a child custody case in Arizona are often surprised when religious issues come up. When one parent practices a faith, and the other does not, or when parents follow different religions, questions about a child’s religious upbringing can quickly become a serious source of conflict.These disagreements may involve holidays, religious school choices, attendance at religious services, or whether a child should be introduced to one belief system over another.
This article explains how Arizona law addresses religion and custody, what family courts typically order and will not, and how mixed-faith families can reduce conflict. Whether you already have a custody order or are in the middle of a child custody dispute, this guide will help you understand how religious upbringing issues are handled and how an experienced family law attorney from Colburn Hintze Maletta can help protect your rights as a parent.
Navigating Child Custody Issues in Arizona?
Speak with our Family Law Attorneys at CHM Law today.
Or, Continue Reading Below About:
Religious Upbringing Clauses in Arizona Child Custody Orders: Mixed Faith Parenting, Holidays, and What Courts Usually Avoid Ordering
Religion and Child Custody Under Arizona Law
Arizona family law does not favor or disfavor any religion.
Courts are not allowed to decide custody based on whether a parent’s religious beliefs are popular, traditional, or unconventional. I
Instead, religion is treated as one factor that may be relevant only if it affects the child’s well-being.
Under Arizona law, custody decisions are guided by A.R.S. § 25-403, which sets out factors to consider in the child’s best interests. Religion is not listed as a standalone factor. That omission is intentional.
Courts recognize that parents have a constitutional right to raise their children in accordance with their own beliefs, including religious beliefs, as long as the child is not harmed.
In most child custody disputes, a judge will not intervene in religious matters unless there is evidence of harm to the child.
Simply practicing a faith, raising children in a religion, or taking the child to church or another religious service is not enough for a court to restrict a parent’s actions.
How Legal Custody Affects Religious Decisions
Legal custody refers to the right to make major decisions regarding a child’s life. These decisions regarding education, medical care, and religious upbringing are different from physical custody, which focuses on where the child lives.
When parents share joint legal custody, both parents have the right to make decisions regarding the child’s upbringing.
This includes religious decisions. In these cases, courts expect parents to cooperate, even when they hold different religious beliefs.
If one parent has sole legal custody, that parent generally has the right to make decisions about the children’s religious upbringing.
A parent with sole legal custody may choose whether the child is raised in a particular faith, attends religious activities, or participates in religious education.
Best Interests of the Child and Religious Considerations
Arizona courts apply the best interests standard to every custody case.
When religion affects custody, the court focuses on whether a parent’s religious practices cause harm to the child.
Examples of harm may include emotional distress, denial of necessary medical care, or extreme practices that place the child at risk. If a parent’s religious practices harm the child, the court may step in and limit certain conduct.
Courts do not evaluate whether a religion is right or wrong. The focus is strictly on whether the child is not harmed.
If there is no harm, the court may allow each parent to practice their chosen religious beliefs during parenting time.
Mixed Faith Parenting and Joint Legal Custody
Parents with different religious beliefs often share joint legal custody. In these situations, Arizona courts usually allow each parent to expose the child to their own religion during their parenting time.
This means one parent may take the child to church, synagogue, mosque, or other religious services, while the other parent may not participate in any religious activities. Courts typically see this as part of the child’s life experience, not a custody problem.
Judges rarely require a child to follow only one religion when parents of different faiths share joint legal custody. The court’s goal is to avoid interfering with the free exercise of religion for both parents and the child.
When One Parent Has Sole Legal Custody
When one parent has sole legal custody, that parent has the right to make major decisions, including those involving religious upbringing. A parent with sole legal custody may decide which religious activities the child attends and how the child is raised spiritually.
However, even when one parent has sole legal custody, the non-custodial parent often still has visitation rights. During visitation, that parent may still practice their own religion with the child, unless a court order says otherwise.
A court may restrict religious exposure during visitation only if there is clear evidence that the parent’s actions cause harm to the child. This is a high legal standard and is not met by ordinary religious differences.
First Amendment Rights and Arizona Family Law
The First Amendment protects freedom of religion and the free exercise of religion. Arizona family courts must respect these rights when deciding custody and visitation matters.
Because of these protections, courts are cautious about issuing religious upbringing clauses.
Judges avoid telling parents what to believe or how to practice their faith.
A court order that interferes with a parent’s religious practices may violate constitutional rights unless there is a compelling reason.
Arizona courts have decided a case involving religious upbringing where restrictions were imposed only after evidence showed harm to the child. These cases are the exception, not the rule.
What Arizona Courts Usually Avoid Ordering
Arizona family courts usually avoid ordering that a child be raised in only one religion. Judges also avoid orders that prohibit one parent from exposing the child to their religion.
Courts do not typically order parents to attend religious services, stop attending religious services, or raise the child in their religion. They also avoid language that favors one parent’s religious beliefs over the other’s.
The court may step in only if religious practices interfere with parenting time, cause harm to the child, or undermine the child’s interest in stability and safety.
Holidays, Religious Services, and Parenting Time
Religious holidays are a common source of conflict in mixed faith parenting. Parenting plans often address holidays to avoid confusion and disputes.
Arizona courts prefer that parents include clear holiday schedules in their parenting plan.
This may include alternating major holidays or assigning certain holidays to each parent.
Courts usually allow each parent to take the children to religious services during their parenting time. Taking children to religious services is generally considered part of normal parenting unless it interferes with the child’s health or safety.
What Happens When Parents Disagree About the Religious Upbringing
When parents disagree about the religious upbringing, courts encourage communication and compromise. Mediation is often recommended before asking a judge to intervene.
If parents cannot agree, the court may review whether the disagreement affects the child’s best interests. The court may consider whether the conflict, rather than the religion, causes harm to the child.
In rare cases, a court may assign final decision-making authority on religious decisions to one parent, even within shared joint legal custody, if ongoing conflict harms the child.
Important Things to Remember About Religion and Custody
- Arizona courts do not favor one religion over another
- Religious beliefs alone do not determine custody
- The best interests of the child guide every decision
- Courts avoid restricting religious practices without evidence
- Parents usually retain the right to religious expression during parenting time
How a Family Law Attorney From CHM Law Can Help
Religious issues in child custody cases can quickly become emotional and confusing. Parents often worry about losing influence over their child’s upbringing or being restricted from practicing their faith. A skilled family law attorney can help protect your rights while keeping the focus on your child’s well-being.
At Colburn Hintze Maletta, our family law attorneys have extensive experience handling custody and visitation disputes involving religious concerns. We understand how Arizona courts balance constitutional rights with the best interests standard and how to present your case clearly and effectively.
Whether you are negotiating a parenting plan, modifying an existing custody order, or facing litigation, our legal team can help you address religious upbringing issues without unnecessary conflict. We offer free one-on-one consultations and serve families throughout Arizona.
To speak with a family law attorney about your custody or visitation concerns, contact Colburn Hintze Maletta today at (602) 825-2500 or visit https://chmlaw.com to schedule your consultation.
Always Available 24/7 for Legal Help
Schedule an Appointment Today!
Call Us Now to Speak with an Attorney (602) 825-2500
Real Client Reviews
Below are just a few of what our clients have to say!
“He is a very impressive man! He was outstanding throughout the entire process”
David Maletta representing me made me very delighted. He is a very impressive man! He was outstanding throughout the entire process. Superbly cordial and expert. Having him on my side made all the difference in the world. I couldn’t have imagined a better result. I advise him to everyone who is facing legal difficulties. I appreciate all of your effort.
Audy - Avvo Review
“I actually interviewed 5 potential lawyers and David was the most optimistic of all of them.”
I have nothing but good things to say about my experience working with David Maletta. I was in a very high stress situation facing a pending dui charge. He doesn’t know this but I actually interviewed 5 potential lawyers and David was the most optimistic of all of them. He took over and handled everything, and now I don’t have to live with a dui. Thank you so much for everything! Highly recommend to anyone looking for legal help.
Lauren Koontz - Google Review
“Thankful for the excellent service he provide”
Dave stayed with me while he pushed back and forth with Covid-19 and the delays with the court. Once cited, the state basically decides that your guilty through the automatic suspension of your drivers license. Dave immediately took care of that problem and I never lost the privilege of driving. Dave took notes like crazy and was upfront about our uphill battle. I was also well aware that the plea deal that was given to us, was unacceptable and through Dave’s knowledge and experience I had put my trust in him to guide me to make the right decision on how to proceed. With Daves guidance I had decided that we needed to fight for something better than what the prosecutor was offering and Dave was 100 percent behind me on that decision. We knew the risks, be we also knew we had very little to lose based on the prosecutions stance. We decided to go to trial. I knew and felt that it was a long shot based on some of the information in the police report, but I also knew that it was not true. We met previous to the trial so I could better understand what the process is once we get into the court room. Dave answered may questions and spent a lot of time with me trying to be sure I understood things and what time I needed to be there and what would happen once we got there. We worked together on jury selection on the day of trial and we began the case. Watching the prosecution and then watching Dave was night and day!! Dave brought the case to life, Dave grabbed the attention of the jury, Dave had me staring, listening, watching and not missing a beat when he went to fight for me, his client. He went through his notes through the 2 days of trial and his big book. It was clear that he was completely familiar with the facts of the case, the facts on the incident and the responsibility of the prosecution in areas that they weren’t competent. Dave took steps throughout the 2 days that sometimes had me concerned, but his experience calmed me down, once he educated me on this. It was clear to the jury that we working as team. It was clear to the jury that the prosecution didn’t have their facts straight and were not addressing the facts that they could not address. I was nervous to say the least. There was a lot at stake for my personal life and my work life. I was found NOT GUILTY. Dave won the trial for me. I was not only found not guilty, I was found not guilty on 2 counts. I owe this to Dave to truly bring the facts forward, make the arguments, show his passion and his knowledge of the facts and convince the jury that they had reasonable doubt and could not find me guilty. Dave has some fire in him that will come out in trial and it’s rare to have someone with enough personality to relate to the jury and to his client. I am so thankful that I had Dave Maletta as my attorney. It has taken me over a week to finally let it all soak in after 2 1/2 years of stress.
Gregory - Avvo Review
“Felt very confident after talking with with them both”
It was recommended to consult with Tim and Darin here. Absolutely phenomenal! Very professional and friendly, took my concerns very seriously, and helped me find a resolution that was in my best interest. Felt very confident after talking with with them both.
Ty Harp - Google Review
“Their attention to detail and dedication to their clients is next to none”
Tim and Dave are two of the best attorneys I have ever known. Their attention to detail and dedication to their clients is next to none. It is an honor to highly recommend this firm for representation.
Steven Scharboneau - Google Review
“Their service was by far the best! Couldn’t be happier”
Their service was by far the best! Couldn’t be happier, This firm had me at ease and with full confidence, took much of stress off. Can’t help to mention but thanks to Juanita for your patience with me.
Hose B - Google Review
“Their professionalism and dedication were evident in every interaction”
I had an outstanding experience with Colburn Hintze Maletta PLLC. Their team provided expert legal guidance and support throughout my case. They were responsive, thorough, and always kept me informed. Their professionalism and dedication were evident in every interaction, and they navigated the complexities of my situation with skill and efficiency. I am grateful for their expertise and highly recommend Colburn Hintze Maletta PLLC to anyone in need of reliable and effective legal representation.
Devin Farias - Google Review
“I always felt heard and valued”
One of the standout features of CHM Law is its client-focused approach. I always felt heard and valued, and their communication was prompt and transparent. They kept me informed every step of the way, which significantly eased my anxiety throughout the legal process.
Terence Carroll - Google Review
“Very professional, and efficient and they are always here for you.”
Hands down the absolute best team you will ever work with. Throughout the entire process never had to worry about anything at all. Very professional, and efficient and they are always here for you.
Amina Riley - Google Review
“He was very kind and courteous”
Mr. David Maletta was very kind and courteous when he called me I explained my situation and he listened and then told me that I was fine. When I need a lawyer I will go through this firm and not be worried at all. Thank you again Mr. Maletta
Harold W Garlock Jr - Google Review
“She always had my best interest in mind”
Lauren was outstanding throughout the whole process. She was always available as needed, upfront and honest, and very knowledgeable. Most lawyers don’t really have your best interest in mind. It’s all about their pocketbook. Lauren never gave that impression and comes from a place of sincerity. She always had my best interest in mind. If you happen to be unfortunate enough to need a lawyer, I sincerely recommend Lauren. I can’t imagine how anyone could be disappointed.
Daniel- Google Review
“They handled my case very well”
I had a very great experience with Colburn Hintze Maletta PLLC, they handled my case very well and the process was smooth. definitely will be recommending it!
Ezrah Laina - Google Review
“He treated us as individuals with unique circumstances and emotions”
I had an incredibly positive experience with Colburn Hintze Maletta’s firm, especially thanks to attorney Henry Álzate. He played a crucial role in guiding my mother’s case, especially regarding financial support after her unexpected divorce. Henry demonstrated a profound commitment, ensuring to pursue of the best possible outcome with dedication and empathy. One of Henry’s standout qualities is his genuine care for individuals. Despite my mother’s language barrier, Henry facilitated communication, ensuring she comprehended every step of the legal process. This made a significant difference in our comfort and understanding throughout the case. His ability to convey complex legal matters in a clear and compassionate manner is truly admirable. Throughout our interactions, Henry’s charisma and warmth made us feel valued beyond just being clients; he treated us as individuals with unique circumstances and emotions. His support and determination to achieve favorable results for my mother were evident from start to finish. I highly recommend Henry Álzate and the Colburn Hintze Maletta firm for anyone seeking legal assistance, especially in family law matters. Henry’s professionalism, empathy, and dedication are exemplary, ensuring that clients receive not only exceptional legal representation but also genuine support during challenging times.
Yajaira Magana - Google Review
“She was knowledgeable and patient but educated as well”
Juanita was absolutely wonderful and a pleasure to meet. She was knowledgeable and patient but educated as well to be more involved and aware of our case. Thank you, Juanita, for being a blessing to us! May God continue to bless you tenfold!
Cassandra Hemphill- Google Review
“I recommend his service to anyone who is looking for a lawyer n the Arizona area”
I was facing a probation violation. I’m from Ohio and was sentenced to 4 years probation back in 2016. I violated back in Ohio I picked up another charge and was sentenced to 18 months in Ohio. As soon as I was released Arizona was there to pick me up to come to Arizona to answer that violation. The prosecutor wanted a presumption 5-year prison term. Dave and I went threw the process for 3 months and finally at the end Dave got me reinstated back on probation with 3 yrs credited so I only had to complete 1 yr on probation. Dave had me do a couple extra things the help better my case out I took his advice did community service while waiting for the outcome and did a couple other things, at the end it worked in my favor I recommend Dave service to anyone who is looking for a lawyer n the Arizona area, he is a hard worker him and his associates and they get u the best outcome possible. I appreciate everything he did and it was well work the price. Thanks Dave appreciate it.
Rasta - Avvo Review
“This was the best possible outcome, great price, and fast.”
Darin helped me with a complex family law issue involving ownership of multiple businesses and other assets. He was able to structure a win-win that wasn’t only better than I thought was possible but that protected the business I had built. Above and beyond that, he did it with great customer service and character – which really matters to me. This was the best possible outcome, great price, and fast.
David R. - Google Review
“Excellent Service”
I had a really good experience with this law firm. Very polite and educated me when I needed. Very friendly service as well.
Stacey Yarberry - Google Review
“She is a fierce advocate who will fight to protect you”
Lauren Bostick is an extremely skilled, competent, and compassionate attorney! She is a fierce advocate who will fight to protect you, your family, and your rights! I could not have picked a better attorney and highly recommend her for any family law matters. Her exceptional work deserves commendation.
jydiaz30 - Google Review
“I appreciate everything more than they will ever know”
Both my attorney Judie Rettelle and paralegal Whitney Stricker made a very difficult situation in my life (a divorce with 2 young children involved) a bit easier with first and foremost, their kindness to me and patience with me. I appreciate everything more than they will ever know. They were also extremely knowledgeable on all fronts and extremely prompt and detailed with their communication. I function the same way, so that really helped a lot. Thank you both again for everything. No one wants to have to go through a divorce, but if it happens, you need someone you can trust and count on – CHM and Judie/Whitney specifically – are those people.
Jennifer kelley - Google Review
“He demonstrates a high level of confidence through his genuine attempt to do what is best for his client.”
To put my trust in someone to protect and defend me, who I never knew, was a tremendous leap to take. From the beginning of our interaction and throughout this process, Tim demonstrated credibility. He is methodical: and follows through on his initial commitment to turn over every stone. He is systematic: he plans and organizes his strategy, by not only following the rule of law but keeping me informed on outcomes and next steps in the process while providing objective, realistic advice. He is strategic: he directs his interrogations and arguments by reviewing data, and preparing for and adapting to circumstances within the trial. He demonstrates a high level of confidence through his genuine attempt to do what is best for his client.