Arizona’s new Alec and Lydia Act Changes How Family Courts Address Domestic Violence. Watch Below
Quick Facts About This Article
- Arizona custody orders must reflect a child’s best interests standard.
- Domestic violence findings can restrict legal decision-making and parenting time.
- Courts may require supervised parenting time when safety concerns exist.
- HB2995 is associated with Arizona’s proposed Alec and Lydia Act.
- Evidence in custody cases may include police reports and messages.
- Arizona law distinguishes legal decision-making from physical parenting time orders.
- Protective orders can affect exchanges, contact, and parenting schedules terms.
- A.R.S. § 25-403 lists factors for best interest custody decisions.
- Child abuse allegations often require prompt evidence preservation and court review.
- Parenting plans commonly address transportation, exchanges, holidays, and communication between parents.
Why Does HB2995 Arizona Matter in Custody Cases?
HB2995 Arizona matters because it reflects a serious public concern about child safety when domestic violence is part of a child custody case. Parents often hear the phrase Alec and Lydia Act and wonder whether it changes how courts look at abusive parents, supervised parenting time, or unsupervised custody. At Colburn Hintze Maletta, PLLC, our family law team regularly helps parents sort through these questions with calm, practical guidance.
HB2995 Arizona is commonly associated with Arizona’s proposed Alec and Lydia Act, a reform effort focused on court decisions involving domestic violence, child safety, and parenting time. Under current Arizona law, judges already must consider domestic violence when deciding legal decision making and parenting time. As of 2026, families should understand both the public discussion around HB2995 and the statutes that courts currently apply.
Custody cases involving domestic violence can be emotionally difficult and fact heavy. A judge may need to review police reports, orders of protection, medical records, text messages, testimony, and the child’s best interests before entering orders. In our experience, the safest approach is to prepare early, present evidence clearly, and avoid assumptions about what the court will do.
Get Immediate Help from Our Family Law Attorneys.
We are Available to Talk Now.
Or, Continue Reading Below About:
Arizona’s Alec and Lydia Act | HB2955
What Is HB2995 Arizona and the Alec and Lydia Act?
HB2995 Arizona is a legislative proposal connected to the Alec and Lydia Act, which focuses on child custody cases involving alleged domestic violence or abuse. The public discussion around the bill centers on whether courts should place stronger limits on unsupervised custody when a parent has committed domestic violence or presents a safety risk.
The official Arizona Legislature bill text for HB2995 provides the formal language introduced in the legislative process. A bill proposal is not the same as a final court order in a specific family case. Parents should be careful not to assume that a headline, social media post, or bill summary answers what will happen in their courtroom.
In child custody cases, Arizona uses the phrase legal decision making instead of custody for major decisions about a child. This usually includes education, health care, and religious upbringing. Parenting time means the schedule for when each parent has time with the child. The phrase unsupervised custody is often used by parents, but courts usually discuss unsupervised parenting time, supervised parenting time, or restricted contact.
The Alec and Lydia Act discussion is important because it highlights a practical concern many parents face. A parent may believe the other parent is dangerous, but the court still needs admissible evidence, a clear requested order, and a lawful basis to limit contact. Our attorneys help clients connect those facts to Arizona custody standards rather than relying only on labels.
How Does Current Arizona Law Treat Domestic Violence in Custody?
Current Arizona law requires courts to consider domestic violence when deciding legal decision making and parenting time. The best interests standard is found in A.R.S. § 25-403, which lists factors judges consider when deciding what custody arrangement serves a child. Those factors include the child’s relationship with each parent, the child’s adjustment to home and school, mental and physical health, and whether domestic violence or child abuse occurred.
Arizona also has a specific domestic violence custody statute, A.R.S. § 25-403.03. Under current law, that statute addresses the effect of domestic violence on legal decision making and parenting time. In plain language, a parent who has committed significant domestic violence may face limits on legal decision making, and the court must consider safety when deciding parenting time.
Legal decision making is addressed separately in A.R.S. § 25-403.01. Domestic violence itself is defined in criminal law in A.R.S. § 13-3601, which identifies certain offenses that may be treated as domestic violence depending on the relationship between the people involved. These laws often interact when a family court judge is asked to decide whether parenting time should be supervised, limited, or structured with safety rules.
The table below summarizes several key legal concepts parents often encounter in Arizona child custody cases involving domestic violence. It is a general overview, not a prediction about any one case.
| Legal concept | Arizona authority | Practical meaning |
| Best interests | A.R.S. § 25-403 | The court focuses on what arrangement serves the child’s welfare. |
| Domestic violence in custody | A.R.S. § 25-403.03 | Domestic violence can affect legal decision making and parenting time. |
| Legal decision making | A.R.S. § 25-403.01 | This concerns major decisions about health, education, and upbringing. |
| Domestic violence definition | A.R.S. § 13-3601 | Certain crimes may qualify as domestic violence based on relationship facts. |
As of 2026, parents should assume the court will look closely at both the evidence of abuse and the proposed safety plan. Judges typically want specific facts, dates, documents, and practical options for keeping the child safe while respecting lawful parental rights.
What Evidence Matters When Domestic Violence Is Raised?
Evidence matters because the court usually needs more than fear, suspicion, or general conflict before limiting a parent’s time with a child. Domestic violence may be proven through testimony, records, photographs, reports, messages, and witness information. The stronger the connection between the evidence and child safety, the more useful it may be in a custody hearing.
Useful evidence may include:
- Police reports, incident numbers, arrest records, or charging documents.
- Orders of protection, injunctions, or prior family court orders.
- Photos of injuries, damaged property, or threatening messages.
- Medical records, counseling records, or school attendance concerns.
- Texts, emails, voicemails, social media messages, and call logs.
- Names of witnesses who saw injuries, threats, stalking, or unsafe exchanges.
- Records showing substance abuse, weapons concerns, or unsafe driving with children.
Not every document will be admissible in court. Admissible evidence means evidence the judge is allowed to consider under the rules that apply to the hearing. Our attorneys often help clients organize evidence, identify gaps, and decide which records support the requested parenting plan.
It is also important to avoid evidence mistakes. A parent should not alter messages, coach a child, record conversations unlawfully, or violate an existing court order to gather information. If you are unsure whether a document can be used, ask a lawyer before filing it or sending it to the other parent.
Can a Court Limit Unsupervised Custody for Safety Reasons?
Yes, a court can limit unsupervised parenting time when credible safety concerns support restrictions under Arizona law. Parents often use the phrase unsupervised custody, but the court is usually deciding whether parenting time should happen without supervision, with supervision, or under detailed safety conditions. The focus is normally the child’s safety and best interests.
Possible safety measures may include supervised parenting time, monitored exchanges, no alcohol or drug use before visits, no firearms access during parenting time, counseling requirements, or communication limits. In some cases, the court may order exchanges through a neutral location or third party. In more serious cases, parenting time may be temporarily restricted while the court reviews evidence.
When domestic violence is proven or strongly supported, the court may consider whether the abusive parent can safely exercise parenting time. A judge may also consider whether the parent accepts responsibility, follows prior orders, completes treatment, or continues threatening behavior. These facts can affect whether restrictions are temporary, long term, or tied to specific conditions.
Parents requesting limits should propose clear, workable terms. A request that says the other parent is dangerous may be less helpful than a request that identifies specific safety steps. For example, a proposed order might address who supervises visits, where child exchanges happen, how messages are sent, and what happens if a parent misses a required treatment session.
How Do Protective Orders and Criminal Allegations Affect Parenting Time?
Protective orders and criminal allegations can significantly affect parenting time, but they do not replace the family court’s custody analysis. An order of protection may limit contact between parents, restrict messages, or create rules for exchanges. If children are included in the order, the family court may need to address parenting time carefully.
Arizona’s courts provide public information about protective orders through the Arizona Judicial Branch protective order resources. Those materials can help people understand the basic process, but they do not tell a parent what to request in a contested custody case. A lawyer can help make sure the protective order, parenting plan, and any criminal case conditions do not conflict.
Criminal allegations may also matter. A domestic violence arrest, assault charge, child abuse investigation, or weapons allegation may raise concerns in family court. Still, family court and criminal court are separate systems, and each has its own procedures, burdens, and timelines.
At Colburn Hintze Maletta, PLLC, our background in both family law and criminal defense can be helpful when these issues overlap. We have represented clients in emotionally complex custody disputes and serious criminal matters, and our team understands how one case can affect the other. We work to protect the client’s rights while keeping the child’s immediate safety and long term stability in focus.
What Should a Parent Do Before a Custody Hearing?
A parent should prepare before a custody hearing by organizing evidence, identifying safety concerns, and deciding what specific orders to request. Preparation matters because judges often have limited time and need clear information. A focused presentation is usually more effective than a long history of every disagreement between the parents.
Before a hearing, consider these practical steps:
- Write a timeline of domestic violence incidents, including dates and locations.
- Gather documents that support each major event in the timeline.
- Save messages in a complete format, including sender, date, and context.
- List witnesses and describe what each witness personally observed.
- Review existing orders before requesting changes or taking action.
- Prepare a proposed parenting plan with clear safety terms.
- Speak with an attorney before filing sensitive records involving children.
Parents should also think about the child’s daily needs. A parenting plan should address school drop offs, medical appointments, extracurricular activities, holidays, transportation, and communication. If supervision is requested, the plan should identify a realistic supervisor or program when possible.
Under current law, the court may consider whether each parent is likely to allow frequent and meaningful contact with the other parent, but domestic violence can change how that factor is weighed. A parent who seeks protection should explain why the requested limits are tied to safety, not punishment. Our team helps clients make that distinction clearly and respectfully.
FAQs About HB2995 and the Alec and Lydia Act
1. Is HB2995 Arizona already the rule in every custody case?
No, HB2995 Arizona should not be treated as the automatic rule in every custody case. Parents should look to current Arizona statutes, any final legislation, and the judge’s orders in their specific case.
2. What does the Alec and Lydia Act focus on?
The Alec and Lydia Act focuses on child safety concerns in custody cases involving domestic violence or abuse. The public discussion is especially concerned with abusive parents receiving unsupervised parenting time despite serious warning signs.
3. Can domestic violence affect legal decision making in Arizona?
Yes, domestic violence can affect legal decision making in Arizona. A.R.S. § 25-403.03 requires courts to address domestic violence when deciding whether joint or sole legal decision making is appropriate.
4. Can a parent request supervised parenting time?
Yes, a parent can request supervised parenting time when safety concerns support that request. The parent should be ready to present evidence and propose specific supervision terms.
5. Does an order of protection automatically change custody?
No, an order of protection does not automatically resolve every custody issue. It can affect contact and exchanges, but the family court may still need to enter or modify parenting time orders.
6. What if the other parent denies the abuse?
A denial does not end the court’s review of domestic violence allegations. The judge may consider testimony, documents, prior reports, witness statements, and the credibility of each parent.
7. Should children testify in domestic violence custody cases?
Children usually should not be placed in the middle of custody litigation unless the court allows an appropriate process. An attorney can help explore safer options, such as records, professional input, or court approved procedures.
8. Can custody orders be changed after new violence occurs?
Yes, custody orders may be changed when new facts justify a modification under Arizona law. The correct process depends on the existing order, the urgency, and the available evidence.
How Colburn Hintze Maletta, PLLC Can Help with HB2995 Arizona in Arizona
CHM Law can help by evaluating how HB2995 Arizona, the Alec and Lydia Act discussion, and current Arizona custody law may relate to your family situation. Our attorneys handle family law matters with empathy, preparation, and practical strategy. We understand that domestic violence allegations, child custody, and parenting time disputes require both careful legal analysis and steady communication.
Our firm is based in Arizona and handles family law and criminal defense matters, including cases where protective orders, domestic violence allegations, and parenting plans overlap.
Our firm’s attorneys have years of experience in handling high conflict cases where domestic violence and child custody are an important issue. Our team is proud to have been listed by Super Lawyers and Rising Stars from 2021 through 2026.
This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Contacting Colburn Hintze Maletta, PLLC does not create an attorney client relationship unless the firm agrees in writing to represent you. To discuss your specific situation, call (602) 825-2500 or reach us through our contact page.
Attorney Darin Colburn has experienced first-hand just how difficult going through a family law matter such as divorce is when his parents divorced when he was 6 years old. Twenty years later, he has devoted his entire legal career to helping those facing similar issues. Darin attended the University of Arizona and graduated Cum Laude from the Eller College of Management. Darin is an experienced trial attorney that excels in high-net-worth divorce, complex business valuations, and messy child custody disputes.
Always Available 24/7 for Legal Help
Schedule an Appointment Today!
Call Us Now to Speak with an Attorney (602) 825-2500
Real Client Reviews
Below are just a few of what our clients have to say!
“He fights for his clients like no one I have ever seen”
David Maletta is the absolute best trial attorney in the state of Arizona. He is a kind, emphatic, and extremely patient person. As an attorney, he is prepared, aggressive, and extremely skilled. He is not afraid to go to trial and fight for his clients, like other attorneys that just plead their clients to the original charges. When he is in trial, he flips a switch and goes from a nice guy to a killing machine. He fights for his clients like no one I have ever seen. Watching him do a cross-examination is exhilarating because he is so good it’s scary.
Patricia Bevins - Google Review
“I couldn’t be more satisfied with my experience”
I recently had the pleasure of working with Colburn Hintze Maletta, and I couldn’t be more satisfied with my experience. From the initial consultation to the final resolution of my case, the team demonstrated exceptional professionalism, expertise, and dedication.
Kyla Gress - Google Review
“I was found NOT GUILTY. Dave won the trial for me.”
Dave stayed with me while he pushed back and forth with Covid-19 and the delays with court. Once cited, the state basically decides that you’re guilty through the automatic suspension of your drivers license. Dave immediately took care of that problem and I never lost the privilege of driving. Dave took notes like crazy and was upfront about our uphill battle. I was also well aware that the plea deal that was given to us, was unacceptable and through Dave’s knowledge and experience I had put my trust in him to guide me to make the right decision on how to proceed. With Dave’s guidance I had decided that we needed to fight for something better than what the prosecutor was offering and Dave was 100 percent behind me on that decision. We knew the risks, be we also knew we had very little to lose based on the prosecutions stance. We decided to go to trial… Watching the prosecution and then watching Dave was night and day!! It was clear to the jury that the prosecution didn’t have their facts straight and were not addressing the facts that they could not address…There was a lot at stake for my personal life and my work life. I was found NOT GUILTY. Dave won the trial for me.
Gregory - AVVO Review
“Excellent Service”
I had a really good experience with this law firm. Very polite and educated me when I needed. Very friendly service as well.
Stacey Yarberry - Google Review
“She was knowledgeable and patient but educated as well”
Juanita was absolutely wonderful and a pleasure to meet. She was knowledgeable and patient but educated as well to be more involved and aware of our case. Thank you, Juanita, for being a blessing to us! May God continue to bless you tenfold!
Cassandra Hemphill- Google Review
“She was able to take my worries and fears off my shoulders”
There is not a single mother out there who is ever prepared for the phone call from the local police department. That phone call can change your life. I got into contact with Jessica Hernandez of Colburn Hintze and Maletta and she was able to take my worries and fears off my shoulders. She worked extremely hard to get the results that my son needed and got him released with probation. She was able to set my mind at ease and she continued to remind me that these actions of my son did not define the person he is. What a gift to have someone defend my child and at the same time not make me feel like I was judged as a bad parent or a failure. Thank you Jessica for taking him on and for never giving up on him. Thank you for being an amazing attorney and for always taking my questions.
Brandy Waldeck- Google Review
“The service provided to me was outstanding”
Absolutely amazing! The service provided to me was outstanding. They listened & made sure I was taken care of. I definitely recommend to everyone!
Nautica - Google Review
“She exhibited remarkable attention to detail”
I recently engaged the legal services of Attorney Lauren Bostick to finalize my divorce, and I am compelled to share my experience as it was truly exceptional. Going through a divorce is undoubtedly a challenging and emotionally taxing process, but Lauren navigated me through it with professionalism, compassion, and unwavering dedication. From our initial consultation, it was evident that Lauren possessed a deep understanding of family law and a genuine commitment to helping clients through difficult transitions. Lauren exhibited remarkable attention to detail, ensuring that every aspect of my case was thoroughly examined and addressed. She took the time to listen attentively to my concerns, patiently answering my questions and providing clear explanations of the legal processes involved. Lauren has the ability to balance assertiveness in negotiations with a sincere desire to achieve a fair and amicable resolution. Furthermore, Lauren demonstrated exceptional professionalism and reliability throughout the entire duration of my case. She was consistently responsive to emails and calls, promptly addressing any new developments or inquiries that arose. This level of accessibility and responsiveness greatly alleviated much of the stress associated with a divorce. In conclusion, I wholeheartedly recommend Lauren Bostick to anyone in need of legal representation for divorce proceedings. Her combination of legal expertise, compassion, and dedication truly sets her apart as an outstanding advocate for her clients.
Cathy Miller - Google Review
“Forever grateful I chose this practice for my representation”
David Maletta is nothing short of a miracle worker. While I don’t believe anyone looks forward to hiring an attorney, David makes the legal process as stress free as it can be and does not give up until you obtain the outcome he is working towards. Forever grateful I chose this practice for my representation.
Michelle DeDora- Google Review
“He wanted the best outcome for me and not to settle just to be done”
I recently went through a divorce, with two children and custody to settle, my lawyer was Darin Colburn and he made the experience as painless as possible for me. Darin listened to my case, listened to my questions, and helped ensure I got a fair settlement. Along the way, I often wanted things to hurry up from my ex, and Darin was patient in reminding me that he wanted the best outcome for me and not to settle just to be done, but to get a fair settlement. From answering my phone calls, and emails and explaining the legal process around divorce I felt that Darin had my best interest at heart and had the experience for me to have a divorce where I was happy with the outcome. I would highly recommend this office and Darin Colburn to anyone looking for a family attorney.
Lindsay Hudson- Google Review
“Outstanding Family Law Attorney Office”
Outstanding Family Law Attorney Office the team provided exceptional service during a difficult time. Their professionalism, empathy, and expertise in family law were evident from start to finish. They were always responsive and offered clear, practical advice that made navigating my case much easier. I highly recommend them for anyone in need of a trustworthy and skilled family law attorney.
Lisa Carranza - Google Review
“He was professional, knowledgeable, understanding and very patient”
Darin has been great!!! I unfortunately, had a very long and complicated divorce because of the circumstances involved. He was professional, knowledgeable, understanding and very patient. I would highly recommend him for any legal services he can provide.
Ann Gaston- Google Review
“The best legal counsel”
Huge Shoutout to Dave and Juanita for being the best legal counsel! From the moment they answered the phone they were very understanding and patient
Andrew Vazquez - Google Review
“They were exceptional from start to finish”
My experience with Colburn Hintze Maletta was exceptional from start to finish. They were very attentive to my concerns and questions. They took the time to explain the legal process clearly and kept me informed at every step. Their professionalism and commitment to achieving the best outcome for me was evident throughout the entire process. I highly recommend this firm to anyone seeking reliable and effective legal representation.
Chimal Lopez - Google Review
“I will, without hesitation, seek his counsel in the future if there is ever a need”
In a time of panic, Mr. Hintze proved to be invaluable I recently was denied a level one fingerprint clearance card through the Arizona Department of Public Safety as a result of a misdemeanor charge that occurred 16 years ago in my youth. This fingerprint card was the only thing standing between me and my ability to attend Arizona State University’s Edison College of Nursing. When I explained the details of my denial he immediately devised and executed a plan that ultimately resulted in me being awarded my fingerprint clearance card. Mr. Hintze’s confidence and steady demeaner brought a sense of relief to me, as I knew from the first conversation we had that his steadfast ability to navigate toward a productive resolution would be instrumental in my success. I appreciate Mr. Hintze beyond words and I will, without hesitation, seek his counsel in the future if there is ever a need.
Amanda - Avvo Review
“He is the best he got all the charges dropped”
I was assaulted by two drunk bigots who threw anti semitic slurs at me outside of my favorite restaurant. Im 5’8 158 pounds the main guy “William” who assaulted me is 6’2 205 pounds and tattooed up but falsely claimed I hit him so hard his face was swollen up to the point where he couldn’t work for a month and was seeking $7348 in damages. A false police report was filed against me and William’s best friend Taylor who also assaulted me corroborated the bs story to the best of his ability. For a while I lost my faith in humanity because I was being charged with assault for self defense by the state of Arizona. Rather than pay off William with a misdemeanor compromise I did something he didn’t expect and hired David. In court David proved to the judge that William and Taylor were lying through cross examination he found four cases where they contradicted each other or changed their stories. David also brought up police body camera footage of a civilian explaining what happened which was a completely different story than what William and Taylor had told police, the look on the prosecutors face was priceless. If found guilty I would have a criminal record for the rest of my life and probably lose my real estate license so it meant the world to me that David got all the charges dropped.
Michael - Avvo Review
“AMAZING communication!”
AMAZING communication!! I was impressed by their commitment to going the extra mile for me. Highly recommend!
Sandi Jarquin - Google Review
“Their dedication and expertise ensured a favorable outcome”
I highly recommend this team for their exceptional professionalism and compassionate approach. They guided us through a challenging time with clear communication and unwavering support, making the process much easier for our family. Their dedication and expertise ensured a favorable outcome, and we are truly grateful for their outstanding service.
Armando Diaz - Google Review
“Thank you so much for your help and for truly caring”
I would like to thank Juanita & the office staff on behalf of my family. You are one of the best law firms I have ever dealt with. Your overall help during our time of need was outstanding. Thank you so much for your help and for truly caring.
LaDonia Coe-Watson - Google Review
“They provided excellent legal representation with clear communication and a strategic approach”
I highly recommend. They provided excellent legal representation with clear communication and a strategic approach. From start to finish, their professionalism and expertise were evident, resulting in a successful resolution of my case. Their responsiveness and support made a challenging process much easier. Overall, exceeded my expectations and I wouldn’t hesitate to use their services again.