⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 5 Star Rated Best Family Law, Criminal Defense, Personal Injury, and DUI Lawyers in Phoenix
Forgery in Arizona is governed by ARS 13-2002, which gives prosecutors broad authority to pursue charges when they believe someone acted with the intent to defraud. These cases often involve financial records, identification documents, checks, contracts, or electronic records. In Phoenix and across Maricopa and Pinal Counties, forgery cases are often charged alongside other fraud-related crimes, which can significantly increase the stakes in criminal law.
Firearms are widely owned across the state, and the lawful use of a firearm in Arizona includes activities such as hunting, target shooting, and personal protection. Even so, strict rules apply to when and where a firearm may be used. One of the most important laws in this area addresses the discharge of a weapon within populated areas.
Parents going through a child custody case in Arizona are often surprised when religious issues come up.When one parent practices a faith, and the other does not, or when parents follow different religions, questions about a child’s religious upbringing can quickly become a serious source of conflict.These disagreements may involve holidays, religious school choices, attendance at religious services, or whether a child should be introduced to one belief system over another.
Drive-by shooting charges are among the most serious firearm-related felony offenses prosecuted under criminal law in Arizona. A drive-by shooting in Arizona is treated as a violent and dangerous offense because it involves firing a deadly weapon from a moving or occupied vehicle, often placing the public at risk. When police believe someone intentionally shot the gun from a vehicle toward a person, another occupied motor vehicle, or an “occupied structure,” the case escalates immediately into a major felony investigation.
Parents expect that if police question their child, certain protections will be followed. One of the most important is the requirement that law enforcement read the Miranda rights before custodial questioning begins. But in real situations, especially those involving younger teenagers, officers sometimes proceed without providing the required warning. When that oversight goes unnoticed early in a criminal case, the problem may not come to light until the juvenile court process is already underway.