Inherent in a blood test is a 5% margin of error according to the prosecutor’s own expert witness. However, our expert will testify that there is a 10% margin of error in the instrument. This means the BAC can be 10% higher, lower, or anywhere in between the reported value. The prosecutor has the burden of proving the case beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, the defendant gets the benefit of the doubt that the reading is 10% lower.
Black Friday, a day synonymous with significant retail discounts and crowded shopping venues, often sees a surge in customer-related injuries. This phenomenon is backed by notable statistics, such as the Black Friday Death Count website reporting 17 deaths and 125 injuries related to Black Friday incidents since 2006. The hustle and commotion characteristic of this day raises important questions about legal responsibility and avenues for compensation in the event of an injury.
In Arizona, personal injury claims and issues of liability in such scenarios are governed by specific laws and statutes. For instance, premises liability, under Arizona Revised Statutes, holds store owners responsible for ensuring the safety of their patrons. This becomes particularly relevant on Black Friday, where the risk of injuries like trampling, slip and fall accidents, and altercations increase due to the high density of shoppers. Additionally, Arizona’s comparative negligence laws may impact claims, wherein an injured party’s potential compensation can be a
As autonomous vehicles make their way into mainstream media companies like Waymo, Tesla, BMW, and Uber, each bringing their own innovative take on self-driving vehicle technology. Although these driverless options are not fully available for everyone, they have already started challenging traditional notions of vehicle operation and liability. For example, Waymo relies heavily on advanced algorithms, while Tesla features its Autopilot mode, and BMW and Uber are both in the developmental stages of their own self-driving technologies. Despite these advancements, the issue of human oversight and responsibility remains a critical concern.Regardless of the built-in safety measures or the limited availability of these driverless cars, the unfortunate reality is that accidents still occur. When these incidents happen, and no one is in direct control of the vehicle, questions about who will be held responsible becomes complex for injury compensation.
Accidents due to tire failures aren’t always the driver’s fault; sometimes, they result from tire defects. Every year, individuals in the U.S. die due to problems with tires. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration documented 622 fatalities in 2021.
Tire maintenance is necessary and failure to keep tires in good condition can lead to liability for accidents. Some tires even have issues straight from the factory, leading to large-scale recalls. If you’ve been injured in an accident stemming from faulty tires, a consultation with a skilled attorney at CHM Law can provide insights into your potential legal options.
Entrapment is a defense that arises when law enforcement officers induce a person to commit a crime that they would not have otherwise committed. If a defendant can successfully prove they were entrapped, they may be acquitted of the charges against them. Contact a criminal defense attorney at CHM Law today.
