Trespassing involves entering or remaining on property without permission, a criminal offense under Arizona law.
Understanding the elements of trespassing—knowledge, notice, and intent—is crucial for mounting an effective defense.
These elements establish whether the accused knowingly violated property boundaries with clear awareness and intent.
In criminal defense, proving any of these elements is lacking can lead to acquittal or reduced charges. As such, detailing and contesting these elements forms the backbone of legal strategies in trespassing cases.
Get Immediate Help from Our Criminal Defense Attorneys.
We are Available to Talk Now.
Or, Continue Reading Below About:
Criminal Trespassing
Trespassing Laws in Arizona
In Arizona, trespassing is defined as knowingly entering or remaining unlawfully on any property after being explicitly told by the property owner or occupant, through signage or personal communication, that entry is prohibited.
Arizona’s statutes outline different degrees of trespassing, each with specific criteria that distinguish them based on the property type, the trespasser’s actions, and the presence of any aggravating factors.
▶ Understanding the Degrees of Trespassing
Arizona law breaks down trespassing into three primary categories:
- First Degree Trespassing (ARS 13-1504): This is the most severe form and includes trespassing in or on a residential structure, critical public utility, or with the use of a deadly weapon. It is treated as a felony, and the penalties are significantly harsher, including potential imprisonment.
- Second Degree Trespassing (ARS 13-1503): This involves unlawfully entering or staying in a nonresidential structure or fenced commercial yard. It is categorized as a misdemeanor but carries potential jail time.
- Third Degree Trespassing (ARS 13-1502): The least severe, it includes unlawfully entering or remaining on any other property. This is usually charged as a misdemeanor and may involve a fine or short-term imprisonment
▶ Role of Signage and Notices
Proper signage is a critical element in trespass cases. Property owners are expected to post clear, visible notices prohibiting entry. The absence of such signs can sometimes serve as a defense in trespassing cases, especially where the entry into the area was not obviously restricted.
Elements of Criminal Trespassing
Criminal trespassing in Arizona involves knowingly entering or remaining unlawfully on any real property. The law specifies several key elements:
- Knowledge: The individual must be aware that they are entering or staying on the property unlawfully.
- Notice: The property must be marked with clear signs or fencing, or the trespasser must have received verbal or written notice against entry.
- Intent: There must be an intention to defy the property rights of the owner.
These elements must all be proven beyond a reasonable doubt for a conviction to occur.
What is Aggravated Trespassing
Aggravated trespassing in Arizona represents a more severe form of the basic trespass offense, involving circumstances that elevate its seriousness and potential legal consequences.
This type of trespassing goes beyond unauthorized entry and encompasses actions that pose a greater threat to personal safety or property.
▶ Defining Aggravated Trespassing
Under Arizona law, trespass becomes aggravated when it involves certain aggravating factors that heighten the offense’s severity. These factors typically include:
- Presence of a Deadly Weapon: If the trespasser enters or remains on the property with a firearm or any other deadly weapon, the trespassing charge can be elevated to aggravated trespassing.
- Intent to Harm or Threaten: If the trespasser enters the property with the intent to commit any felony or to harm an occupant or property owner.
- Entry into a Residential Area: Trespassing in any residential structure, or in the immediate yard surrounding a residential structure, especially if the occupants are present at the time of entry.
▶Statutory References and Legal Implications
Aggravated trespassing is most often prosecuted under ARS 13-1504, which outlines the criteria for a first-degree trespass, the most severe form of trespassing, which can include aggravated circumstances. Being charged with aggravated trespass under this statute can result in a class 6 felony, potentially leading to significant penalties including prison time, hefty fines, and a permanent criminal record.
Penalties for Criminal Trespass Charges
In Arizona, the penalties for criminal trespass charges vary significantly based on the degree of the trespass, the circumstances surrounding the incident, and the defendant’s criminal history. Understanding these penalties is crucial for anyone facing such charges, as they can have long-lasting impacts on one’s legal record and personal life.
▶ Breakdown of Penalties by Degree
- Third Degree Trespassing (ARS 13-1502): As the least severe form of trespassing, it typically results in a class 3 misdemeanor. Conviction may lead to up to 30 days in jail, a fine of up to $500, and up to one year of probation.
- Second Degree Trespassing (ARS 13-1503): This mid-level offense is classified as a class 2 misdemeanor. It carries penalties including up to 4 months in jail, a fine of up to $750, and two years of probation.
- First Degree Trespassing (ARS 13-1504): The most serious form, particularly when it involves a deadly weapon or entry into a residential structure. Depending on the specifics, this can be charged as a class 6 felony, which may result in up to 1.5 years in prison for first-time offenders, substantial fines, and three years of probation.
▶ Enhancements and Aggravating Factors
The presence of aggravating factors can lead to enhanced penalties. For instance, if the trespassing occurs with a deadly weapon, or if the defendant has prior convictions, the courts may impose harsher penalties. Additionally, if the trespassing results in any damage to property or harm to individuals, these consequences can further increase.
▶ Impact on Future Opportunities
Beyond immediate legal penalties, a criminal trespass conviction can have broader implications. It may affect employment opportunities, especially in fields that require clean criminal records. It can also impact one’s ability to secure housing, loans, and educational opportunities.
Degree of Trespass | Classification | Penalties |
---|---|---|
Third Degree Trespassing (ARS 13-1502) | Class 3 Misdemeanor | Up to 30 days in jail, up to $500 fine, up to 1 year probation |
Second Degree Trespassing (ARS 13-1503) | Class 2 Misdemeanor | Up to 4 months in jail, up to $750 fine, up to 2 years probation |
First Degree Trespassing (ARS 13-1504) | Class 6 Felony | Up to 1.5 years in prison, substantial fines, up to 3 years probation |
Defenses to Trespass Charges
Defending against trespass charges in Arizona involves several potential legal strategies depending on the circumstances surrounding the case. The defenses aim to either completely exonerate the accused or reduce the severity of the charges. Below are some commonly employed defenses:
① Lack of Notice
- Explanation: One key defense is proving that the defendant had not received proper notice that trespassing was prohibited. This can include situations where there were no clear signs, or the property was not adequately fenced.
- Legal Relevance: Arizona law requires that property owners provide clear indications that entry is restricted. If these indications are lacking, the defense can argue there was no reasonable way for the defendant to know they were trespassing.
② Implied Consent
- Explanation: Another defense is implied consent, where the defendant had reasons to believe they were allowed on the property. This could be due to previous permissions or the property’s open access to the public at other times.
- Legal Relevance: Implied consent can negate the intent element required for a trespass conviction.
③ Mistake of Fact
- Explanation: This defense applies when the defendant mistakenly believed they had a right to be on the property. For instance, if they thought the property was public or that they had the owner’s permission.
- Legal Relevance: A genuine mistake about the nature of the property or the defendant’s rights concerning it can serve as a defense to criminal intent.
④ Necessity
- Explanation: Necessity can be claimed if the trespass was committed out of an urgent need to avoid a greater harm. For example, entering a property without permission during an emergency to help someone in danger.
- Legal Relevance: This defense acknowledges the trespass but justifies it through the necessity to prevent a more significant injury or damage.
⑤ Ownership or Right to Property
- Explanation: Sometimes, the accused may genuinely believe or actually have a legitimate claim to the property. This could be due to a dispute over property boundaries or ownership rights.
- Legal Relevance: If there’s a credible assertion of ownership or right, it can challenge the unlawful entry aspect of the trespass charge.
These defenses must be thoroughly evaluated and presented based on the facts of each case, typically necessitating the expertise of a knowledgeable defense attorney. Proper legal representation can significantly impact the outcome by effectively utilizing these defenses.
Contact a Criminal Defense Attorney From CHM
The attorneys at Colburn Hintze Maletta (CHM) specialize in defending against trespassing accusations, offering tailored legal strategies that address the specifics of your case. Our team is experienced in challenging the prosecution’s evidence, arguing lack of notice, implied consent, and other key defenses. We also assist in plea negotiations to potentially reduce charges, minimizing the impact on your life.
If you or a loved one faces trespassing charges, contact Colburn Hintze Maletta at (602) 825-2500 for a consultation and secure your defense.
David Maletta is a widely respected criminal defense attorney with over 23 years of experience and has worked on over 1,000 cases and has successfully won over 100 jury trials. David graduated from Northern Arizona University, Magna Cum Laude in 1993 with a degree in Psychology. Shortly thereafter, he earned his Juris Doctor degree from Seton Hall University School of Law in 1998. He has extensive experience in criminal and DUI matters, homicide, sexually-based offenses, domestic violence, white-collar crimes, and various misdemeanor crimes.
Always Available 24/7 for Legal Help
Schedule an Appointment Today!
Call Us Now to Speak with an Attorney (602) 825-2500
Real Client Reviews
Below are just a few of what our clients have to say!