Client had a child out of wedlock with the Opposing Party. Although the Parties were briefly in a relationship, during the pregnancy, it became apparent to Client that the Opposing Party was abusive, which led Client to terminate the relationship before the Child was...
Client sought assistance from Colburn Hintze Maletta (CHM Law) years after his divorce after his ex-spouse filed to have Client held in contempt for non-payment of spousal maintenance. The Parties’ Divorce Decree, which was entered long before CHM established a...
The Parties were married for over thirty years, and the Client was the primary breadwinner for the majority of the Parties’ marriage. After developing a targeted plan of attack for settlement in Client’s initial strategy session, Colburn Hintze Maletta (CHM Law)...
Client hired Colburn Hintze Maletta (CHM Law) to represent him at a temporary order hearing whereat the Opposing Party attempted to reduce his parenting time and obtain sole legal decision-making authority. Over the Opposing Party’s objection, after the hearing, the...
Client came to Colburn Hintze Maletta (CHM Law) for help because he was served with an Emergency Order suspending his parenting time. For the Client, this meant going from being an actively involved parent with equal time to having no contact whatsoever (the Opposing...
